Comparison Overview

Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados

VS

TPIL Lawyers

Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados

Rua Avelino Silveira Franco 149, Campinas , 13105-822, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados is a law firm commited to delivering efficient and reliable legal solutions. Our team consists of highly-qualified professionals who are passionate about what we do, and this is why we excel in our work. Our firm offers legal advice on risk management and on the decision-making processes of our clients, working hard to improve their business and results. In our view, the duty of any outstanding attorney is to master in management skills, understanding the clients’ business and industry. As a full-service law firm, we have several practice areas which provide a full range of legal services to our clients. Our successful cases  are a result of our working philosophy, strategy and high-quality performance. We focus on quality and complexity, not quantity.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 285
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TPIL Lawyers

6 Logan Rd, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

TPIL Lawyers provide legal services for people who want to seek compensation after being injured due to the negligence or negative acts of other people. Servicing claims all over Queensland, we offer our legal assistance on a “no win, no fee” basis. We assist victims of motor vehicle accidents, workplace accidents, and those who suffered an accident or injury while visiting a public place, such as commercial or government premises. Official Partner of the Queensland Rugby League

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finocchio-e-ustra-sociedade-de-advogados.jpeg
Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-personal-injury-lawyers.jpeg
TPIL Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TPIL Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPIL Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TPIL Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPIL Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finocchio-e-ustra-sociedade-de-advogados.jpeg
Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-personal-injury-lawyers.jpeg
TPIL Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TPIL Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TPIL Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company.

In the current year, TPIL Lawyers company and Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TPIL Lawyers company nor Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TPIL Lawyers company nor Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TPIL Lawyers company nor Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company nor TPIL Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company nor TPIL Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados company employs more people globally than TPIL Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Finocchio & Ustra Sociedade de Advogados nor TPIL Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X