Comparison Overview

Finlay

VS

Chevalier

Finlay

44 Tobey Road, Bloomfield, CT, 06002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Finlay Printing provides quality and innovative marketing solutions to a wide range of high-end clients across the nation. Located in central Connecticut, Finlay supports each individual customer with an individualized, cost-effective approach to their specific print needs. Long-term relationships are supported everyday with our experience, innovation and exceptional service, creating value that far exceeds the price.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 105
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chevalier

Nijverheidsweg 46, Hendrik Ido Ambacht, undefined, 3341 LJ, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Chevalier is gespecialieerd in de productie en het management van commercieel drukwerk. Sinds de oprichting in 1916 heeft Chevalier zich ontwikkeld tot een van de grootste en meest moderne zelfstandige grafimedia ondernemingen in Europa met als onderscheidend vermogen productkwaliteit, proceskwaliteit, service en duurzaamheid. Sinds 1 januari 2009 is Chevalier een CO2 neutrale onderneming.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finlay.jpeg
Finlay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chevalier.jpeg
Chevalier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Finlay
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chevalier
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finlay in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chevalier in 2025.

Incident History — Finlay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finlay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chevalier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chevalier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finlay.jpeg
Finlay
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chevalier.jpeg
Chevalier
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chevalier company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Finlay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chevalier company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Finlay company.

In the current year, Chevalier company and Finlay company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chevalier company nor Finlay company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chevalier company nor Finlay company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chevalier company nor Finlay company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Finlay company nor Chevalier company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Finlay company nor Chevalier company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chevalier company employs more people globally than Finlay company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Finlay nor Chevalier holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N