Comparison Overview

Finishing Design Services Limited

VS

Reliabl

Finishing Design Services Limited

The Old Foundry, Brow Mills, Halifax, West Yorkshire, GB, HX3 8EF
Last Update: 2025-11-25

We offer a complete machine manufacturing service ranging from simple jigs and workstations to large production machines. We understand that our customers need reliable machines that can be depended upon to consistently produce high quality products with maximum efficiency. We work closely with our customers to produce innovative and robust technologies to enhance their manufacturing processes, reducing labour costs and improving efficiency. All our machines comply with the latest health and safety and ergonomic standards. Our main customers are in the OEM automotive, construction and food industries; however we have also completed many successful projects for customers in other sectors. Our business is built around consistently providing outstanding technical innovation, build quality and support at very competitive prices.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Reliabl

4899 W 2100 S, West Valley City, Utah, 84120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Reliabl is the Intermountain West’s critical power supplier, providing Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems for businesses that require a constant power supply. When failure is not an option, Reliabl helps protect businesses from power outages, disruptions, and surges. Our team of critical power experts have experience designing, implementing, and maintaining power systems and work quickly to deliver businesses with customized and cost-effective power solutions. With products from the top UPS brands, 24/7 emergency support, and unmatched expertise, Reliabl provides uninterrupted power to customers in healthcare, manufacturing, government, emergency services, and more. Visit our website or contact our team to learn more about our systems and services.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finishing-design-services-limited.jpeg
Finishing Design Services Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliabl.jpeg
Reliabl
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Finishing Design Services Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reliabl
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finishing Design Services Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliabl in 2025.

Incident History — Finishing Design Services Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finishing Design Services Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reliabl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliabl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finishing-design-services-limited.jpeg
Finishing Design Services Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliabl.jpeg
Reliabl
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reliabl company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Finishing Design Services Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Reliabl company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Finishing Design Services Limited company.

In the current year, Reliabl company and Finishing Design Services Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reliabl company nor Finishing Design Services Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reliabl company nor Finishing Design Services Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reliabl company nor Finishing Design Services Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited company nor Reliabl company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Reliabl company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Finishing Design Services Limited company.

Finishing Design Services Limited company employs more people globally than Reliabl company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Finishing Design Services Limited nor Reliabl holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H