Comparison Overview

Fines and Fees Justice Center

VS

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications

Fines and Fees Justice Center

185 W Broadway, New York, undefined, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/

The Fines & Fees Justice Center seeks to restore integrity to our justice system by catalyzing a movement to eliminate the fines and fees that distort justice. Our goal is to eliminate fees in the justice system and to make fines proportional to the offense and the individual. As national center for advocacy, information, and collaboration, FFJC’s mission is to create a justice system that treats individuals fairly, ensures public safety and community prosperity, and is funded equitably. Led by two nationally-recognized experts, FFJC works collaboratively with justice system stakeholders and affected communities to end abusive collection practices and eliminate the justice tax. To accomplish our mission, FFJC is developing a model for comprehensive reform in the states, creating a National Clearinghouse, and providing support for reform efforts around the country.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications

Catherine Richards House, Southend on Sea, SS1 1EF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ima.org.uk

The Institute of Mathematics and its Applications (IMA) is the UK's learned and professional society for mathematics and its applications. Founded in 1964, we were incorporated by Royal Charter in 1990 and subsequently granted the right to award Chartered Mathematician designation. We also award the Chartered Scientist designation and the Chartered Mathematics Teacher designation. We promote mathematics research, education and careers, and the use of mathematics in business, industry and commerce. Among our activities we produce academic journals, organise conferences, and engage with government. Our members come from a multiplicity of different organisations – we have university academics, industrial engineers, financiers, school teachers, scientists, civil servants, and so on. Because mathematics is ubiquitous, so is our membership base. We currently have around 5,000 members, of whom about forty per-cent are employed in education (schools through to universities), with most of the rest in commercial, industrial and governmental organisations.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finesandfeesjc.jpeg
Fines and Fees Justice Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-mathematics-and-its-applications.jpeg
Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fines and Fees Justice Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fines and Fees Justice Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Mathematics and its Applications in 2025.

Incident History — Fines and Fees Justice Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fines and Fees Justice Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute of Mathematics and its Applications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finesandfeesjc.jpeg
Fines and Fees Justice Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-mathematics-and-its-applications.jpeg
Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fines and Fees Justice Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fines and Fees Justice Center company.

In the current year, Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company and Fines and Fees Justice Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company nor Fines and Fees Justice Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company nor Fines and Fees Justice Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company nor Fines and Fees Justice Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center company nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center company nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications company employs more people globally than Fines and Fees Justice Center company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fines and Fees Justice Center nor Institute of Mathematics and its Applications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References