Comparison Overview

Fine Line Graphics Inc.

VS

Nimax

Fine Line Graphics Inc.

90 Douglas Pike, Smithfield, RI, 02917, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1991, Fine Line Graphics has remained a highly successful competitor in prepress graphics and flexographic photopolymer plate manufacturing industry. We specialize in all aspects of packaging for the food, beverage, medical, agricultural, and home goods marketplace. Our customer base is comprised of both Flexo and Offset printers, converters as well as Consumer Product Groups. Over the past 30 years in business, Fine Line has expanded our footprint to service our customers on a nationwide scale. Our “Customer Focused, Service, Quality FIRST” business model has given us the ability to respond quickly to customer demands and develop tailor made solutions for each of our customers’ needs. Our company’s success rests on the skill, depth, and determination of our employees. As the packaging industry evolves and consumer demands are ever-changing, having talented, dedicated, and motivated individuals gives our company the ability to grow and prosper, while retaining top level industry talent. We are proud to say that Fine Line Graphics Inc. is still under our founding ownership. We remain a privately owned, family operation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nimax

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Printing company of specialist flexible packaging, located in the east of Nederland in Elst Gld. Nimax has small web flexo and rotogravure presses with additional features like embossing, slitting, die cutting. We serve the tobacco market with innerliners, the tea market with a variaty of tags and envelopes and produce bands for the embroidery yarn industry. Supply world wide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-line-graphics-inc..jpeg
Fine Line Graphics Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nimax
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fine Line Graphics Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nimax
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fine Line Graphics Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nimax in 2025.

Incident History — Fine Line Graphics Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fine Line Graphics Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nimax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nimax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-line-graphics-inc..jpeg
Fine Line Graphics Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nimax
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nimax company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fine Line Graphics Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nimax company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fine Line Graphics Inc. company.

In the current year, Nimax company and Fine Line Graphics Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nimax company nor Fine Line Graphics Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nimax company nor Fine Line Graphics Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nimax company nor Fine Line Graphics Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. company nor Nimax company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. company nor Nimax company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fine Line Graphics Inc. company employs more people globally than Nimax company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fine Line Graphics Inc. nor Nimax holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N