Comparison Overview

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.

VS

4Printings

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.

Varey Road, Congleton, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd are manufacturers of high quality wallcoverings based in the heart of Cheshire, England, in the Town of Congleton. Our factory includes a team of skilled designers, colourists and printers, an experienced sampling team and product development specialists working together, with a variety of new substrates and techniques to ensure that we produce the most beautiful and cutting edge designs in the market. Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd is a family owned 5th generation business, employing 120 employees at our site in Congleton. These employees bring a wealth of knowledge with some having over 40 years’ experience developing their craft. We have a truly diverse portfolio of projects and are proud to produce wallpaper, stickers and borders for any of today’s household names. We are one of the oldest wallcovering establishments in the UK and through continuous innovation and passion, we have established a heritage brand.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

4Printings

1063 W El Camino Real, Mountain View, California, 94040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

4Printings is a print shop in Mountain View, CA that offers local customers the opportunity to get premium color printing services at prices they’ll love. We specialize in providing copies, business cards, letterheads, brochures, flyers, banners, car graphics, window decals, signs, and more. So whether you seek printing services in Mountain View near Los Altos, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and San Jose. 4Printings has the top-quality materials and superb customer service to accommodate your needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-decor.jpeg
Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4printings.jpeg
4Printings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
4Printings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 4Printings in 2025.

Incident History — Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 4Printings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

4Printings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-decor.jpeg
Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4printings.jpeg
4Printings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

4Printings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 4Printings company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company.

In the current year, 4Printings company and Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 4Printings company nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 4Printings company nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 4Printings company nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company nor 4Printings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company nor 4Printings company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company employs more people globally than 4Printings company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. nor 4Printings holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L