Comparison Overview

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco

VS

Spike Island Artspace Limited

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco

50 Hagiwara Tea Garden Drive, None, San Francisco, CA, US, 94118
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Fine Arts Museums welcome more than 1.5 million visitors annually to enjoy an ambitious schedule of special exhibitions and education programs along with our world-class collection of 151,000 important artworks. Our staff is building on these successes to further expand the Museums’ reach with an exciting array of innovative and groundbreaking projects. Comprising the de Young Museum in Golden Gate Park and the Legion of Honor in Lincoln Park, the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco are together the largest public arts institution in the City of San Francisco, and one of the largest art museums in the United States.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 422
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spike Island Artspace Limited

133 Cumberland Road, Bristol, BS1 6UX, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Spike Island is an international centre for the development of contemporary art and design, located close to Bristol’s harbourside. It is a place where artists and the public can meet, enabling audiences to engage with artists’ research and production. Within the 80,000 square foot building, Spike Island offers visitors a year-round programme of internationally relevant exhibitions, events and activities, as well as providing working space for artists, designers and creative businesses. The link between the production and presentation of art on this scale and under one roof is unique within the UK. Spike Island’s programme emphasises the commissioning of new ambitious work and often provides artists their first significant gallery exhibition in the UK. Spike Island Exhibition Services support the development of commissions, including in-house post production facilities for artists’ film and video, audio visual technical services and equipment provision for ambitious moving image installations, on site fabrication workshops, resin rooms, skilled art technicians and fabricators.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-arts-museums-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spike-island-artspace-limited.jpeg
Spike Island Artspace Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spike Island Artspace Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spike Island Artspace Limited in 2026.

Incident History — Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spike Island Artspace Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spike Island Artspace Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-arts-museums-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spike-island-artspace-limited.jpeg
Spike Island Artspace Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spike Island Artspace Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spike Island Artspace Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company.

In the current year, Spike Island Artspace Limited company and Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spike Island Artspace Limited company nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spike Island Artspace Limited company nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spike Island Artspace Limited company nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company nor Spike Island Artspace Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company nor Spike Island Artspace Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company employs more people globally than Spike Island Artspace Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco nor Spike Island Artspace Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H