Comparison Overview

Financiera Contigo

VS

Colonial Bank

Financiera Contigo

Paseo de la Reforma 2430 Lomas Altas Ciudad de México, Distrito Federal 11950, MX
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Somos una microfinanciera que ofrece servicios de calidad a mujeres emprendedoras que requieran un crédito para expandir sus actividades productivas a través de montos adaptados a las necesidades de cada cliente y de manera grupal. Otorgamos créditos de manera ágil y oportuna, mediante trámites sencillos y personalizados basándonos en una relación de confianza. Todo esto para cumplir con nuestra misión de Cambiar Vidas.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Colonial Bank

3939 Belt Line Rd Addison, TX 75001, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

BB&T formerly Colonial is a financial services company headquartered in Winston-Salem, NC. About BB&T Printable Version Building on a tradition of excellence in community banking that stretches back to 1872, BB&T continues to offer clients a complete range of financial services including banking, lending, insurance, trust, and wealth management solutions.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/financiera-contigo.jpeg
Financiera Contigo
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colonial-bank.jpeg
Colonial Bank
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Financiera Contigo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colonial Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Financiera Contigo in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colonial Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Financiera Contigo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Financiera Contigo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colonial Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colonial Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/financiera-contigo.jpeg
Financiera Contigo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colonial-bank.jpeg
Colonial Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Financiera Contigo company and Colonial Bank company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Colonial Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Financiera Contigo company.

In the current year, Colonial Bank company and Financiera Contigo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colonial Bank company nor Financiera Contigo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colonial Bank company nor Financiera Contigo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colonial Bank company nor Financiera Contigo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Financiera Contigo company nor Colonial Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Financiera Contigo company nor Colonial Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Financiera Contigo company nor Colonial Bank company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X