Comparison Overview

FinanceFeeds

VS

LOLC Holdings PLC

FinanceFeeds

Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 0 and 549

The world’s premier news publication for the online trading industry.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

LOLC Holdings PLC

No. 100/1, Sri Jayewardenepura Mawatha, Rajagiriya,, 10100, LK
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

A formidable global conglomerate, LOLC Holdings has strategically diversified into key economic growth sectors across financial services, leisure, agriculture and plantations, construction and real estate, manufacturing and trading, technology, research and innovation and strategic investments. The LOLC Group is on an accelerated growth trajectory and is inspired by the quest to nurture and shape the future of individuals and communities across the world. As a leading player in the International MSME sector, the LOLC Group has been a catalyst in facilitating, whilst striving to maximise environmental benefits through green financing, promoting financial independence for women and uplifting customers from poverty through financial inclusion in global markets. In keeping with its alignment to UN Sustainable Development Goals, LOLC is a catalyst of economic development as a responsible lender while maintaining strong client protection principles. Transforming communities in the South and South East Asian markets, the LOLC Group has made giant strides to entrench its footprint across Africa and Central Asia. The Group has already built its reputation as one of the largest multi-currency, multi-geography inclusive finance platform in the world, backed by advanced tech platforms designed by its fully-owned subsidiary companies which have now been successfully adopted across borders.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/financefeeds.jpeg
FinanceFeeds
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lolc.jpeg
LOLC Holdings PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FinanceFeeds
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LOLC Holdings PLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FinanceFeeds in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LOLC Holdings PLC in 2025.

Incident History — FinanceFeeds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FinanceFeeds cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LOLC Holdings PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LOLC Holdings PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/financefeeds.jpeg
FinanceFeeds
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Escrow Service, Peer-to-peer Transactions
Motivation: Financial Gain, Money Laundering, Coercion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lolc.jpeg
LOLC Holdings PLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LOLC Holdings PLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FinanceFeeds company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FinanceFeeds company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LOLC Holdings PLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, LOLC Holdings PLC company and FinanceFeeds company have not reported any cyber incidents.

FinanceFeeds company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while LOLC Holdings PLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

FinanceFeeds company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other LOLC Holdings PLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LOLC Holdings PLC company nor FinanceFeeds company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FinanceFeeds company nor LOLC Holdings PLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FinanceFeeds company nor LOLC Holdings PLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LOLC Holdings PLC company employs more people globally than FinanceFeeds company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FinanceFeeds nor LOLC Holdings PLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X