Comparison Overview

Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation

VS

University of Waterloo

Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Ленинградский проспект, дом 49, Москва, RU
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749

Financial University is one of the leading Russian institutions of higher learning with more than ninety years’ history. During these years, we have been accumulating and passing on to the new generations our pedagogical, scientific, and organizational experience. Intensity of the educational process, involvement in progressive developments, readiness to embrace large-scale transformations, quick response to changing life challenges and ability to meet them have always distinguished this higher education institution. Having preserved achievements and the best traditions of the Russian and Soviet higher school, we have enriched the educational process by constantly introducing efficient up-to-date educational technologies, thus providing high quality professional training and research work. The Financial University has always been open for cooperation with foreign partners. Today it is a truly international university both in terms of the student body and the nature of its activities, a university which is becoming actively integrated into the European and global educational and research community.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 776
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

University of Waterloo

200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, CA, N2L 3G1
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849

University of Waterloo is a leader in innovation that drives economic and social prosperity for Canada and the world. We are home to a renowned talent pipeline, game-changing research and technology, and unmatched entrepreneurial culture, that together create solutions to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s challenges. Our greatest impact happens together. A strategic integration of research and teaching excellence, the world’s largest co-operative education program, entrepreneurship-intensive programs, and creator-owned IP, has resulted in extensive industry collaboration, the generation of thousands of commercial and social enterprises, and a dynamic learning experience for more than 41,000 undergraduate and graduate students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,421
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finance-university-under-the-government-of-the-russian-federation.jpeg
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Waterloo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Waterloo in 2026.

Incident History — Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finance-university-under-the-government-of-the-russian-federation.jpeg
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Waterloo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Waterloo company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Waterloo company and Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while University of Waterloo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company nor University of Waterloo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Waterloo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company.

University of Waterloo company employs more people globally than Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation nor University of Waterloo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.