Comparison Overview

File & ServeXpress

VS

Radcliffe Chambers

File & ServeXpress

500 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Irving, TX, 75062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30

File & ServeXpress, headquartered in Irving, Texas, focuses on providing attorneys with case, document and party management solutions that simplify the litigation workflow of a case. By offering electronic filing to courts, process service, secure document exchange among judges and attorneys, alert and notification tools, and a document repository, File & ServeXpress offers a complete litigation solution for the life of a case. File & ServeXpress was formed in 2012 through an acquisition of two of the pioneers of eFiling and electronic service – CaseFileXpress and File & Serve, a former LexisNexis company. The resulting combination brought together products and teams with more than 25 years of experience in legal eFiling and service delivery, forming the leader in the industry. File & ServeXpress team has successfully worked with attorneys and courts around the country to implement electronic filing, with existing eFiling and/or eService projects spanning 30 states and the District of Columbia. The current products in the File & ServeXpress portfolio include File & ServeXpress and CaseFileXpress. File & ServeXpress manages more than 82 million documents, works in 1,400 courts nationwide and has almost 200,000 registered users, Our clients include users from the top 100 Am Law firms and top 50 plaintiff firms in the country.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Radcliffe Chambers

London, London, WC2A 3QB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Radcliffe Chambers is described by The Legal 500 as “‘a go-to set’ for Chancery and commercial work”. We are a modern barristers'​ chambers based in Lincoln’s Inn, London. We have 70 barristers, including 12 KCs, practising in all areas of Chancery and commercial law. We have many recommendations in the current editions of Chambers and Partners and The Legal 500 directories. The achievements of individual members have been recognised in recent years in the STEP Private Client Awards, The Lawyer Awards and The Lawyer’s Hot 100. Radcliffe Chambers was a recent winner of the 'Client Service Set of the Year'​ at the Chambers and Partners Bar Awards and, has won ‘Chambers of the Year 2016’ at the STEP Private Client Awards and Halsbury Legal Awards. As a barristers'​ chambers, we are not a company or partnership. Our barristers are independent, self-employed practitioners. Our common aim, however, is to provide clients with the highest standard of expertise and service. We have a dedicated and experienced staff led by two senior clerks and a Chief Executive who all help to provide the outstanding service. Members of Radcliffe Chambers practise in the fields of banking and financial services (including consumer credit and mortgages); charities; company and commercial law; insolvency; pensions; professional negligence; property; trusts and private client work. Members have also acquired notable expertise in other areas such as agriculture, court of protection cases, ecclesiastical law, mines and minerals; offshore, partnerships and joint ventures, planning and local government; tax and telecommunications. For full details please see our website: www.radcliffechambers.com or follow us @radcliffechmbrs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/file-&-servexpress.jpeg
File & ServeXpress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/radcliffe-chambers.jpeg
Radcliffe Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
File & ServeXpress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Radcliffe Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for File & ServeXpress in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radcliffe Chambers in 2025.

Incident History — File & ServeXpress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

File & ServeXpress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Radcliffe Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radcliffe Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/file-&-servexpress.jpeg
File & ServeXpress
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/radcliffe-chambers.jpeg
Radcliffe Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both File & ServeXpress company and Radcliffe Chambers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Radcliffe Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to File & ServeXpress company.

In the current year, Radcliffe Chambers company and File & ServeXpress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Radcliffe Chambers company nor File & ServeXpress company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Radcliffe Chambers company nor File & ServeXpress company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Radcliffe Chambers company nor File & ServeXpress company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither File & ServeXpress company nor Radcliffe Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

File & ServeXpress company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Radcliffe Chambers company.

Radcliffe Chambers company employs more people globally than File & ServeXpress company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither File & ServeXpress nor Radcliffe Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X