Comparison Overview

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA

VS

Motor Power Company

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA

11240 County Line Rd, None, Mt Pleasant, WI, US, 53177
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA (Fii USA) is a global leading professional design and manufacturing service provider of communication network equipment, cloud service equipment, precision tools, and industrial robots. Our goal is to provide our customers with intelligent manufacturing services for new forms of electronic equipment products centered on the industrial internet platform. Our Vision: Fii USA is creating technology solutions in 5G, IoT, and Industrial AI to aid businesses in transforming to the Industry 4.0 environment. Our Philosophy: Fii USA will leverage its’ 30 years’ experience in contract manufacturing to develop technology solutions that will guide businesses on their Industry 4.0 journey. We are building industrial IoT ecosystems grounded solutions that utilize 5G communication technology, 8K imaging data, Industrial AI, and high-performance computing. Our solutions are easily implemented, modified, and scaled to enable participation in the modern connected landscape.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 377
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Motor Power Company

Via Fratelli Guerra 23/A, Reggio nell'Emilia, 42124, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Motor Power Company specializes in motion control solutions such as direct drive torque motors, brushless motors or gearless motorollers. We provide mechanical integration for technological automation upgrades. Our approach is simple: we identify a need and implement a solution. Our long-term investments in the study of motion have created a deep well of knowledge in all aspects of motion technology. We care a lot about our people, our engineers and designers. We reward creativity, intellectual growth and continuing investment in knowledge. The result is an innate ability to come up with original ideas that allow the design and final performance of our products to stand out in the market. Do you have a project to develop? Let's talk about it.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fii-usa.jpeg
Foxconn Industrial Internet USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motor-power-company.jpeg
Motor Power Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foxconn Industrial Internet USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Motor Power Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foxconn Industrial Internet USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motor Power Company in 2025.

Incident History — Foxconn Industrial Internet USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Motor Power Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motor Power Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fii-usa.jpeg
Foxconn Industrial Internet USA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motor-power-company.jpeg
Motor Power Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Motor Power Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Motor Power Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company.

In the current year, Motor Power Company company and Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Motor Power Company company nor Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Motor Power Company company nor Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Motor Power Company company nor Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company nor Motor Power Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company nor Motor Power Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company employs more people globally than Motor Power Company company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Motor Power Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H