Comparison Overview

Fight To End Cancer

VS

Public Outreach Fundraising

Fight To End Cancer

Century 21 Brown | Attn: Fight To End Cancer, 3048 Bloor St W. Unit 1A, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M8X 1C4
Last Update: 2025-12-18

We’re Fighting To Support World-Class Cancer Research Since 2011, our gala event has spotlighted new groups of white-collar men and women stepping into the ring for the first time, while our corporate event, Friday Night Fights ‘To End Cancer,’ showcases amateur athletes in intense competition. Both events provide an authentic experience of Olympic-style boxing, fuelled by rigorous training and passionate fundraising efforts. Together, these initiatives have raised over $3 million for cancer research, with all proceeds going to The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation. Our Ambassador Program also empowers our community to fight year-round, allowing supporters to champion the cause and make a lasting impact beyond the ring. Our motto is simple: DEFEAT IS NOT AN OPTION!

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Public Outreach Fundraising

347 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2V8, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Public Outreach is a leading face-to-face monthly donor recruiting agency operating in Canada, the United States and Australia. We are known best for a) our ability to complete large contracts on time and on budget, b) our non-commission staff who receive compliments from donors and near zero complaints, c) we provide excellent donor retention, d) we supply outstanding servicing and support. At Public Outreach we focus our staff recruitment on mission alignment to the charities we serve. We are one of the few organizations operating completely free of commissions. Public Outreach is continually rated by staff internationally as the best employment opportunity they have ever experienced.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fight-to-end-cancer.jpeg
Fight To End Cancer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-outreach-fundraising.jpeg
Public Outreach Fundraising
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fight To End Cancer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Outreach Fundraising
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fight To End Cancer in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Outreach Fundraising in 2025.

Incident History — Fight To End Cancer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fight To End Cancer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Outreach Fundraising (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Outreach Fundraising cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fight-to-end-cancer.jpeg
Fight To End Cancer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-outreach-fundraising.jpeg
Public Outreach Fundraising
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Outreach Fundraising company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fight To End Cancer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public Outreach Fundraising company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fight To End Cancer company.

In the current year, Public Outreach Fundraising company and Fight To End Cancer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Outreach Fundraising company nor Fight To End Cancer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Outreach Fundraising company nor Fight To End Cancer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Outreach Fundraising company nor Fight To End Cancer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fight To End Cancer company nor Public Outreach Fundraising company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fight To End Cancer company nor Public Outreach Fundraising company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public Outreach Fundraising company employs more people globally than Fight To End Cancer company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fight To End Cancer nor Public Outreach Fundraising holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N