Comparison Overview

Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP

VS

Fraser Litigation Group

Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP

64 Gothic St, Suite 4, Northampton, Massachusetts, us, 01060
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP is an international law firm based in Northampton, Massachusetts. Our primary areas of practice and expertise are in entertainment law, intellectual property law, real estate, probate & estate administration, landlord/tenant law, and corporate/business law. Within these areas, we advise clients regarding contracts, licensing, interactive media, commercial and residential real estate transactions, mergers and acquisitions, employment matters, landlord/tenant issues, estate planning and administration, probate, and litigation. The firm has a history of attracting attorneys, staff and clients of exceptional quality and commitment.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fraser Litigation Group

570 Granville Street, Vancouver, V6C 3P1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Fraser Litigation Group is a Vancouver based commercial litigation and dispute resolution firm. We have a deep understanding of issues affecting businesses and offer innovative and cost-effective strategies for practically resolving a wide variety of complex commercial disputes, including breaches of contract, shareholder and partner disputes, insurance coverage, fraud, and intellectual property issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fierst-bloomberg-ohm-llp.jpeg
Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraser-litigation-group.jpeg
Fraser Litigation Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fraser Litigation Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fraser Litigation Group in 2025.

Incident History — Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fraser Litigation Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fraser Litigation Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fierst-bloomberg-ohm-llp.jpeg
Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraser-litigation-group.jpeg
Fraser Litigation Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fraser Litigation Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fraser Litigation Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company.

In the current year, Fraser Litigation Group company and Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fraser Litigation Group company nor Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fraser Litigation Group company nor Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fraser Litigation Group company nor Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company nor Fraser Litigation Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company nor Fraser Litigation Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fraser Litigation Group company employs more people globally than Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP nor Fraser Litigation Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X