Comparison Overview

Field Aerospace

VS

Textron

Field Aerospace

6015 S. Portland Ave., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73159, US
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

A U.S. owned and operated business, Field Aerospace is located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and has over 160,000 sq. ft. of facilities that include offices, hangars, and manufacturing/industrial space, as well as a staff of over 300 technicians, mechanics, engineers and other highly skilled personnel.ย  Our capabilities include aircraft modifications and upgrades, professional project and program management, aircraft maintenance, end-to-end special-mission aircraft services, certification and installation services, logistics, training support and many other custom services. Our integration capabilities include avionics (military and commercial), communications (voice, data links, satellite, secure), ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), and special purpose mission systems. Whatever your mission - be it maintaining a small or large fleet, providing life cycle upgrades, integrating the latest technology, obtaining military or FAA certification - Field Aerospace will be your wing man. - Small enough to be fast, flexible, and innovative - Big enough to manage large and complex programs.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Textron

40 Westminster, Providence, RI, 02903, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Textron Inc. is a multi-industry company that leverages its global network of aircraft, defense, industrial and finance businesses to provide customers with innovative solutions and services. Textron is known around the world for its powerful brands such as Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft, Pipistrel, Jacobsen, Kautex, Lycoming, E-Z-GO, Arctic Cat, and Textron Systems. For more information, visit: www.textron.com.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 25,848
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/field-aerospace.jpeg
Field Aerospace
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textron.jpeg
Textron
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Field Aerospace
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Textron
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Field Aerospace in 2025.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Textron in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Field Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Field Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Textron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Textron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/field-aerospace.jpeg
Field Aerospace
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textron.jpeg
Textron
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Field Aerospace company and Textron company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Textron company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Field Aerospace company.

In the current year, Textron company and Field Aerospace company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Textron company nor Field Aerospace company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Textron company nor Field Aerospace company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Textron company nor Field Aerospace company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Field Aerospace company nor Textron company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Textron company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Field Aerospace company.

Textron company employs more people globally than Field Aerospace company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X