Comparison Overview

Fiedler Law Firm, PLC

VS

Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd.

Fiedler Law Firm, PLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Fiedler Law Firm is a midwest law firm with offices in Des Moines, Iowa and Omaha, Nebraska. We are trial attorneys who practice employee-side employment law and assist employees at all levels of litigation, from consultations to appeals. You deserve to be heard. Fiedler Law Firm gives you a voice.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd.

258 Riverside Drive, River Falls, WI, 54022, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bye, Goff & Rohde personal injury lawyers have been serving Wisconsin and Minnesota residents for 50 years. Our experienced attorneys and dedicated staff have one focus: relentlessly pursue justice on your behalf. Whether you've been in a car accident, had a slip or fall, or have another type of injury, your welfare is our first priority. We're proud to be your personal advocate. The personal injury lawyers at Bye, Goff & Rohde are attentive and responsive. We know that you'll have questions, and we're here to answer them for you. At Bye, Goff & Rohde, we center our practice around you. We are the personal injury attorneys other lawyers trust. Are your clients asking you for personal injury advice? We know that you want to help your clients, but you might not have the systems in place to handle personal injury or a wrongful death suit alone. If you’d like to refer or partner with us when a client’s needs fall outside your specialty or exceed your resources, please contact us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fiedler-&-timmer-pllc.jpeg
Fiedler Law Firm, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bye-goff-&-rohde-ltd-.jpeg
Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fiedler Law Firm, PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fiedler Law Firm, PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Fiedler Law Firm, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fiedler Law Firm, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fiedler-&-timmer-pllc.jpeg
Fiedler Law Firm, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bye-goff-&-rohde-ltd-.jpeg
Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company.

In the current year, Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company and Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company nor Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company nor Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company nor Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. company employs more people globally than Fiedler Law Firm, PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fiedler Law Firm, PLC nor Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X