Comparison Overview

FiberMax Center for Discovery

VS

Svalbard Museum

FiberMax Center for Discovery

1121 Canyon Lake Dr, Lubbock, Texas, 79403, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.agriculturehistory.org

The FiberMax Center for Discovery started in 1969 as the Lubbock County Historical Collection. The Lubbock County Commissioners Court authorized the acquisition and collection of artifacts related to farming on the South Plains and beyond. The Agriculture Heritage Museum was established as a non-profit in 2001 through the efforts of many local leaders to showcase and house the county’s historical collection. Today, over 20,000 visitors come to the museum annually to check out the collection of antique tractors, implements, household items, and hand tools, combined with interactive videos, holograms, and outdoor exhibits. With over 30,000 square feet of interior exhibit space, this educational facility serves as memorial to the thousands of farm families that helped establish the South Plains.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Svalbard Museum

Vei 231-1, Longyearbyen, NO, 9170
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://svalbardmuseum.no

Svalbard Museum shall collect, preserve, disseminate and research related to cultural and natural history, environmental information and cultural preservation on Svalbard. This is fulfilled by e.g.: - Permanent and temporary exhibitions that supports the purpose - Information - Research and publication - Education - Seminars The museum receives operational funding from the Norwegian Government. We are a member of the Norwegian Museums Association and ICOM.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fibermaxcenter.jpeg
FiberMax Center for Discovery
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svalbard-museum.jpeg
Svalbard Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FiberMax Center for Discovery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Svalbard Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FiberMax Center for Discovery in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Svalbard Museum in 2026.

Incident History — FiberMax Center for Discovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FiberMax Center for Discovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Svalbard Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Svalbard Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fibermaxcenter.jpeg
FiberMax Center for Discovery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svalbard-museum.jpeg
Svalbard Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both FiberMax Center for Discovery company and Svalbard Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Svalbard Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FiberMax Center for Discovery company.

In the current year, Svalbard Museum company and FiberMax Center for Discovery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Svalbard Museum company nor FiberMax Center for Discovery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Svalbard Museum company nor FiberMax Center for Discovery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Svalbard Museum company nor FiberMax Center for Discovery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery company nor Svalbard Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FiberMax Center for Discovery company employs more people globally than Svalbard Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FiberMax Center for Discovery nor Svalbard Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References