Comparison Overview

FIBER Festival

VS

Octagon Theatre Bolton

FIBER Festival

Tolhuisweg 2, Amsterdam, 1031 CL, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

FIBER is an Amsterdam based festival and platform, which presents and supports new developments in audiovisual art, digital culture and electronic music. The team works year round with a vibrant network of artists, designers, researchers and developers, who aspire to introduce mind-bending experiences to a broad audience and offer a critical view on the relationship between technology and our living environment. Special attention goes out to the support of up and coming talents across numerous creative disciplines.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Octagon Theatre Bolton

Howell Croft South, Bolton, Greater Manchester, GB, BL1 1SB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Theatre. Made in Bolton. We help to make memories and to ignite curiosity by sharing stories. Stories are at the heart of everything we do at the Octagon – from telling some of the greatest stories ever written to encouraging the young people we work with to tell stories of their own. Our Octagon team, from workshop to box office, actors to directors, help to bring amazing theatre to life in our flexible auditorium. Registered charity no. 248833

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fiber-festival.jpeg
FIBER Festival
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/octagon-theatre-bolton.jpeg
Octagon Theatre Bolton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FIBER Festival
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Octagon Theatre Bolton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FIBER Festival in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Octagon Theatre Bolton in 2025.

Incident History — FIBER Festival (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FIBER Festival cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Octagon Theatre Bolton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Octagon Theatre Bolton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fiber-festival.jpeg
FIBER Festival
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/octagon-theatre-bolton.jpeg
Octagon Theatre Bolton
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Octagon Theatre Bolton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FIBER Festival company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Octagon Theatre Bolton company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FIBER Festival company.

In the current year, Octagon Theatre Bolton company and FIBER Festival company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Octagon Theatre Bolton company nor FIBER Festival company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Octagon Theatre Bolton company nor FIBER Festival company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Octagon Theatre Bolton company nor FIBER Festival company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FIBER Festival company nor Octagon Theatre Bolton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FIBER Festival company nor Octagon Theatre Bolton company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Octagon Theatre Bolton company employs more people globally than FIBER Festival company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FIBER Festival nor Octagon Theatre Bolton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N