Comparison Overview

FGX International

VS

Reckitt

FGX International

500 George Washington Highway, Smithfield, 02917, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 700 and 749

We are FGX International, an EssilorLuxottica company, and a leading global designer and marketer of non-prescription glasses. Featuring Foster Grant®, our premiere eyewear brand with 90 years of heritage, our company continues to design stylish yet affordable eyewear for consumers around the world. Our corporate offices are based in Smithfield, Rhode Island with approximately 400 full-time employees. FGXI also has offices located in New York City; Toronto; Stoke-on-Trent, England; Mexico City; Milan, Italy and Shenzhen, China.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 705
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Reckitt

103-105 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, GB, SL1 3UH
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

Every day, in everything we do, our purpose is to protect, heal and nurture in the relentless pursuit of a cleaner, healthier world. And we have a fight on our hands. A fight to make access to the highest quality hygiene, wellness and nourishment a right and not a privilege. Each of our products is designed to do exactly this. Our well-loved brands have been making a difference to people’s daily lives around the world for more than 200 years. Brands including: Durex, Dettol, Enfamil, Nurofen, Strepsils, Gaviscon, Mucinex, Nutramigen, Lysol, Harpic, Cillit Bang, Finish and Vanish. By 2030, our ambition is to reach half of the world, every year. We’re a growing global community of over 43,000 people on a journey of transformation and sustainable growth. Together, our success will continue to positively impact communities everywhere, for a healthier planet and a fairer society. Want to learn more about us? Visit reckitt.com

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 34,452
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fgx-international.jpeg
FGX International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reckitt.jpeg
Reckitt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FGX International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reckitt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FGX International in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reckitt in 2026.

Incident History — FGX International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FGX International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reckitt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reckitt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fgx-international.jpeg
FGX International
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reckitt.jpeg
Reckitt
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Reckitt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FGX International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FGX International and Reckitt have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Reckitt company and FGX International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reckitt company nor FGX International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Reckitt company and FGX International company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Reckitt company nor FGX International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FGX International company nor Reckitt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Reckitt company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FGX International company.

Reckitt company employs more people globally than FGX International company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FGX International nor Reckitt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.