Comparison Overview

FGX International

VS

the LEGO Group

FGX International

500 George Washington Highway, Smithfield, 02917, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 700 and 749

We are FGX International, an EssilorLuxottica company, and a leading global designer and marketer of non-prescription glasses. Featuring Foster Grant®, our premiere eyewear brand with 90 years of heritage, our company continues to design stylish yet affordable eyewear for consumers around the world. Our corporate offices are based in Smithfield, Rhode Island with approximately 400 full-time employees. FGXI also has offices located in New York City; Toronto; Stoke-on-Trent, England; Mexico City; Milan, Italy and Shenzhen, China.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 705
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

the LEGO Group

Aastvej 1, Billund, DK, 7190
Last Update: 2026-01-18

We are the LEGO Group, the company behind the world’s most loved LEGO® bricks. Our brand name derived from the two Danish words Leg Godt, which mean “Play Well”. We’ve been sparking imaginations and inspiring the builders of tomorrow since 1932. This is our mission and what motivates our colleagues around the world every day. Today, we remain proudly family-owned with headquarters in Billund, Denmark. We have regional hubs in Boston, USA; London, UK; Shanghai, China; and Singapore, as well as 7 manufacturing facilities around the world. These places are home to 31,000+ colleagues in everything from design and engineering to digital technology and marketing. Together we learn, imagine and build – creating play experiences that are sold in over 130 countries worldwide. A purposeful and responsible global brand where creativity helps to inspire builders all around the world. Just imagine being part of that!

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 21,560
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fgx-international.jpeg
FGX International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lego-group.jpeg
the LEGO Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FGX International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
the LEGO Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FGX International in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for the LEGO Group in 2026.

Incident History — FGX International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FGX International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — the LEGO Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

the LEGO Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fgx-international.jpeg
FGX International
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lego-group.jpeg
the LEGO Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

the LEGO Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FGX International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FGX International company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas the LEGO Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, the LEGO Group company and FGX International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither the LEGO Group company nor FGX International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

FGX International company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other the LEGO Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither the LEGO Group company nor FGX International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FGX International company nor the LEGO Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

the LEGO Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FGX International company.

the LEGO Group company employs more people globally than FGX International company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FGX International nor the LEGO Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.