Comparison Overview

FGH Security

VS

Securitas Nederland

FGH Security

FGH Security, Manchester, undefined, M1 4JY, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Established in 2003, FGH are trusted by international brands to keep their assets and millions of people safe every year. We continue to innovate and develop our industry-leading approach to ensure optimum service delivery for our clients. We are accredited by Best Companies and commended for our people focus, commitment to professional development and commitment to delivering the best security and crowd management solutions. Our culture runs organisation wide, from the MD down to the team on the ground, proven as we have been credited as one of the Top 100 companies by the Sunday Times. Our differing ethos has allowed us to become a multi-sector operator, ensuring that we Keep People Safe in every industry. We currently operate in the following sectors: - Events and Festivals - Hospitality and Leisure - Retail Security - Industrial - Public Sector and Government - Property and Estate Management - Education - Transport We are a learning organisation, with a variety of in-house trainers and mentors. We regularly run industry-leading courses in Door Supervision, Spectator Safety, Crowd Management, Education and Training and a suite of First Aid and Mental Health First Aid Qualifications.

NAICS: 5616
NAICS Definition: Investigation and Security Services
Employees: 704
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Securitas Nederland

De Corridor 3a, Breukelen, Utrecht, 3621, NL
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Door de juiste inzet van mens, kennis en techniek vinden we de ideale โ€˜veiligheidsbalansโ€™ voor iedere situatie. Dat begint altijd met heel goed luisteren om zo te doorgronden wat de specifieke omstandigheden en wensen van de klant zijn. Vervolgens groeien we samen naar de gewenste situatie waarin de continuรฏteit van bedrijfsprocessen wordt gewaarborgd. Securitas. Eerst luisteren, dan beveiligen This is the Dutch Securitas company page: Securitas Nederland. For a global connection we kindly refer you to the Securitas Group company page: http://linkd.in/1jZ8Vw0

NAICS: 5616
NAICS Definition: Investigation and Security Services
Employees: 12,786
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fgh-security-ltd.jpeg
FGH Security
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securitas.jpeg
Securitas Nederland
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
FGH Security
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Securitas Nederland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FGH Security in 2025.

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Securitas Nederland in 2025.

Incident History โ€” FGH Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FGH Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Securitas Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Securitas Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fgh-security-ltd.jpeg
FGH Security
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securitas.jpeg
Securitas Nederland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both FGH Security company and Securitas Nederland company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Securitas Nederland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FGH Security company.

In the current year, Securitas Nederland company and FGH Security company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Securitas Nederland company nor FGH Security company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Securitas Nederland company nor FGH Security company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Securitas Nederland company nor FGH Security company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FGH Security company nor Securitas Nederland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FGH Security company nor Securitas Nederland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Securitas Nederland company employs more people globally than FGH Security company, reflecting its scale as a Security and Investigations.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.