Comparison Overview

FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY

VS

Polara Studio

FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Rua Maestro Jaime silva filho 11 - B | 1500-402 Lisboa, PORTUGAL, None, Lisboa, Portugal, PT, 1700-350
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Fernando Guerra has been a pioneer in the way architecture is photographed and divulged. 22 years ago, he opened studio FG+SG together with his brother, and both are responsible in large part for the diffusion of Portuguese contemporary architecture in the last 22 years. Fernando Guerra is an architectural photographer. His training, however, is as an architect. His gaze is divided between two distinct modes of constructing the world. Given this fact, he is in a prime position to personify the metamorphosis of the field of photography that will lead the practice of creating images to eventually identify itself, in part, with the field of architecture. Fernando Guerra's work is regularly published in various national and international publications, in magazines such as Casabella, Wallpaper*, Dwell, Icon, Domus, A + U, among many others. FG+SG collaborates with various Portuguese architects such as Álvaro Siza, Carlos Castanheira, Manuel Mateus, Manuel Graça Dias, Gonçalo Byrne, ARX Portugal, João Luís Carrilho da Graça, Promontório Arquitectos, as well as international architects such as Márcio Kogan, Isay Weifeld, Arthur Casas, Zaha Hadid, Pei Cobb Freed & Partners, among others. The website ultimasreportagens.com has become the starting point for consulting contemporary portuguese architecture with more than six hundred online features, as well as special articles and publications.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Polara Studio

614 SE Hawthorne Blvd, Portland, Oregon, 97214, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

We're Polara Studio in Portland, Oregon. We shoot really great photographs. Whatever you can imagine, whatever you need shot, we have the people, the experience, and the resources to deliver it. And then some. Between the seven of us, we have something like 4 million years of experience. That's if you count past lives. If, for instance, you want to capture people sitting, people standing, people in motion, people who need people, food, people eating food, beverages, bottles, packaging, flowers, landscapes, landscapes filled with flowers, clothing, zippers, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, golf shoes, snow shoes, snowboards, skates, skis, the sky (with or without clouds), sunglasses, big, ugly animals, small, furry, cute animals, bugs and/or things that glow then we're your guys. And gal. We've been around here since 1993. We've worked with a lot of great people and clients and we love what we do. You can see it in our work. If we do say so ourselves.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fg-sg-architectural-photography.jpeg
FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polara-studio.jpeg
Polara Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Polara Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polara Studio in 2025.

Incident History — FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Polara Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polara Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fg-sg-architectural-photography.jpeg
FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polara-studio.jpeg
Polara Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Polara Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Polara Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company.

In the current year, Polara Studio company and FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Polara Studio company nor FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Polara Studio company nor FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Polara Studio company nor FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company nor Polara Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company nor Polara Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Polara Studio company employs more people globally than FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FG+SG | ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY nor Polara Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L