Comparison Overview

FFLGuard

VS

Inc Authority

FFLGuard

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Firearm Industry's Cooperative Legal Service - FFLGuard is an innovative legal services program offered by firearms-trained attorneys, The Chiafullo Group, LLC, where the group acts as National Coordinating Counsel to participating clients. The FFLGuard program is designed to provide participating Federal Firearms Licensees with cost-efficient access to legal professionals, including firearms lawyers, subject matter experts and other qualified personnel (some of whom are former ATF employees), to deliver educational training and rapid response services, with a focus on safeguarding the viability of the client's FFL. FFLGuard's mission is to promote compliance before, during and after ATF inspection, while providing its clients with the tools to be compliant and the attorneys to back them up.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inc Authority

1450 Vassar Street Reno, Reno, NV, 89502, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Be the leader in your life and make the entrepreneurial leap. Your innovation can be your freedom and fortune. With Inc. Authority, you can transform your ideas from problems, into possibilities. Let us help you get started! We are your free, easy-to-use one-stop online source to launch your startup business. Whether it’s a childhood dream or recent revelation, it’s time to regain control of your business ambitions. Be your own boss and decide your earning potential, with the structure and guidance you need to succeed. Starting your business online with Inc. Authority is effortless and provides the reassurance of support from our business startup specialists. Don’t delay, start your future today!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fflguard.jpeg
FFLGuard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inc-authority.jpeg
Inc Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FFLGuard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inc Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FFLGuard in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inc Authority in 2025.

Incident History — FFLGuard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FFLGuard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inc Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inc Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fflguard.jpeg
FFLGuard
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inc-authority.jpeg
Inc Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inc Authority company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FFLGuard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inc Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FFLGuard company.

In the current year, Inc Authority company and FFLGuard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inc Authority company nor FFLGuard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inc Authority company nor FFLGuard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inc Authority company nor FFLGuard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FFLGuard company nor Inc Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FFLGuard company nor Inc Authority company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Inc Authority company employs more people globally than FFLGuard company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FFLGuard nor Inc Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X