Comparison Overview

Festo USA

VS

Schneider Electric

Festo USA

1377 Motor Parkway, Suite 310, Islandia, NY, US, 11749
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Festo is a leading global manufacturer of pneumatic and electromechanical systems, components and controls for process control and factory automation solutions, with more than 55 national headquarters serving over 180 countries. Celebrating over 40 years of innovation in the United States and over 80 years globally, Festo has continuously elevated the state of manufacturing with innovations and optimized motion control solutions that deliver higher performing, more profitable automated manufacturing and processing equipment. Festo continues to use our experiences and knowledge to carry over into other leading industries such as medical and lab automation resulting in an effort to improve the quality of life for all. Our dedication to the advancement of automation extends beyond technology to the education of current and future automation and robotic designers with simulation tools, teaching programs, and on-site services.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 395
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Schneider Electric

35 Rue Joseph Monier, Rueil Malmaison, Paris, FR, 92506
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Schneider Electric is a global energy technology leader, driving efficiency and sustainability by electrifying, automating, and digitalizing industries, businesses, and homes. Its technologies enable buildings, data centers, factories, infrastructure, and grids to operate as open, interconnected ecosystems—enhancing performance, resilience, and sustainability. The portfolio includes intelligent devices, software-defined architectures, AI-powered systems, digital services, and expert advisory. With 160,000 employees and one million partners in over 100 countries, Schneider Electric is consistently ranked among the world’s most sustainable companies. www.se.com Follow us on: https://www.facebook.com/SchneiderElectric https://www.x.com/SchneiderElec https://www.x.com/SE_Careers https://www.instagram.com/schneiderelectric https://www.youtube.com/schneiderelectric https://www.tiktok.com/@schneiderelectric_global

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 81,237
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/festo-usa.jpeg
Festo USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schneider-electric.jpeg
Schneider Electric
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Festo USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Schneider Electric
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Festo USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Schneider Electric has 40.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Festo USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Festo USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Schneider Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schneider Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/festo-usa.jpeg
Festo USA
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schneider-electric.jpeg
Schneider Electric
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised Jira ticketing system
Motivation: Data theft, operational disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer software
Motivation: financial extortion, data theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Festo USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Schneider Electric company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Schneider Electric company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Festo USA company.

In the current year, Schneider Electric company has reported more cyber incidents than Festo USA company.

Schneider Electric company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Festo USA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Schneider Electric company and Festo USA company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Schneider Electric company nor Festo USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Festo USA company nor Schneider Electric company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Schneider Electric company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Festo USA company.

Schneider Electric company employs more people globally than Festo USA company, reflecting its scale as a Automation Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Festo USA nor Schneider Electric holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H