Comparison Overview

Ferrari

VS

Tesla

Ferrari

Abetone inferiore, Maranello, MO, IT, 41053
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ferrari.com

Ferrari's story officially began in 1947 when its first road car, the 125 S, emerged from the gate of no. 4 Via Abetone Inferiore in Maranello. The iconic two-seater went on to win the Rome Grand Prix later that year and shortly thereafter was developed into a refined GT roadster. The company has travelled a long way since then, but its mission has remained unaltered: to make unique sports cars that represent the finest in Italian design and craftsmanship, both on the track and on the road. The very definition of excellence and sportiness, Ferrari needs no introduction. Its principal calling card is the numerous Formula One titles it has won: a total of 16 constructors’ championships and 15 drivers’ championships. And of course, there is the impressive lineup of legendary GT models. Cars that are unique for their design, technology and luxurious styling and that represent the best in Italian the world over.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 9,613
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Tesla

13101 Harold Green Rd, Austin, Texas, US, 78725
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849
https://www.tesla.com/careers

Tesla is accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable abundance. To achieve our mission, we're building a world powered by solar, enabled by battery storage and transported by electric vehicles. We’re committed to hiring and developing top talent from around the world for any given discipline. Headquartered in Texas, we operate six huge, vertically integrated factories across three continents. With over 100,000 employees, our teams take a first-principles approach to designing, building, selling and servicing our products in-house. Our world-class teams operate with a non-conventional philosophy of inter-disciplinary collaboration. Each member of the team is expected to challenge and to be challenged, to create, and to innovate. We’re tackling the world’s most difficult and important problems—and we wouldn’t succeed without our shared passion for making the world a better place.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 72,957
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrari.jpeg
Ferrari
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tesla-motors.jpeg
Tesla
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ferrari
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tesla
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrari in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Tesla has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Ferrari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tesla (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tesla cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrari.jpeg
Ferrari
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Subdomain Hacking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tesla-motors.jpeg
Tesla
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Repurposing of Vehicles
Motivation: Military Use in Conflict
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tesla company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ferrari company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tesla company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Ferrari company.

In the current year, Tesla company has reported more cyber incidents than Ferrari company.

Both Tesla company and Ferrari company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Both Tesla company and Ferrari company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both Tesla company and Ferrari company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Tesla company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ferrari company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tesla company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ferrari company.

Tesla company employs more people globally than Ferrari company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ferrari nor Tesla holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References