Comparison Overview

Ferrari

VS

OPmobility

Ferrari

Abetone inferiore, Maranello, MO, IT, 41053
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ferrari.com

Ferrari's story officially began in 1947 when its first road car, the 125 S, emerged from the gate of no. 4 Via Abetone Inferiore in Maranello. The iconic two-seater went on to win the Rome Grand Prix later that year and shortly thereafter was developed into a refined GT roadster. The company has travelled a long way since then, but its mission has remained unaltered: to make unique sports cars that represent the finest in Italian design and craftsmanship, both on the track and on the road. The very definition of excellence and sportiness, Ferrari needs no introduction. Its principal calling card is the numerous Formula One titles it has won: a total of 16 constructors’ championships and 15 drivers’ championships. And of course, there is the impressive lineup of legendary GT models. Cars that are unique for their design, technology and luxurious styling and that represent the best in Italian the world over.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 9,613
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

OPmobility

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.opmobility.com

OPmobility is a world leader in sustainable mobility and a technology partner to mobility players worldwide. Driven by innovation since its creation in 1946, the Group is today composed of five complementary business groups that enable it to offer its customers a wide range of solutions: intelligent exterior systems, complex modules, lighting systems, energy storage systems and battery and hydrogen electrification solutions. OPmobility also offers its customers an activity dedicated to the development of software, OPn'Soft. SOME NUMBERS IN 2024 📍Economic revenue: €11.6bn (+2.8% vs. 2023) 📍Operating margin: €440m (+11.4% vs. 2023) 📍Sustainability : 🔹Improvement of energy efficiency by 22.0% in 2024 vs. 2019 (excluding Lighting) 🔹35 sites equipped with solar panels and wind turbine (+12 in 2024) 🔹OPmobility awarded an “A” rating by CDP for second year in a row

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrari.jpeg
Ferrari
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opmobility.jpeg
OPmobility
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ferrari
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OPmobility
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrari in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPmobility in 2025.

Incident History — Ferrari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OPmobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPmobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrari.jpeg
Ferrari
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Subdomain Hacking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opmobility.jpeg
OPmobility
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OPmobility company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ferrari company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ferrari company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas OPmobility company has not reported any.

In the current year, OPmobility company and Ferrari company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Ferrari company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while OPmobility company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ferrari company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other OPmobility company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ferrari company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while OPmobility company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ferrari company nor OPmobility company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ferrari company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OPmobility company.

OPmobility company employs more people globally than Ferrari company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ferrari nor OPmobility holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References