Comparison Overview

Ferrara

VS

SC Johnson

Ferrara

404 W Harrison St, Suite 650, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60607
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ferrarausa.com

We are Ferrara, an undisputed leader in sugar confections. Ferrara is #1 in the category in the US with ambitions of being the global leader by leveraging our focus, capabilities, and brand portfolio to drive category development for our community, customer, and consumers. Our diverse portfolio of two dozen brands includes SweeTARTS®, Trolli®, BRACH'S®, Black Forest® and NERDS®, along with iconic favorites like Lemonhead®, Red Hots® and Now and Later®. Headquartered in Chicago, Ferrara has over 4,000 dedicated employees and an operational network of over a dozen locations in North America that includes manufacturing, distribution, and R&D facilities.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 2,064
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

SC Johnson

1525 Howe Street, Racine, 53403, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.scjohnson.com

We’re SC Johnson, a family company at work for a better world™. We are a leading manufacturer of household cleaning products and products for home storage, air care, pest control, shoe care and professional products. SC Johnson’s high-quality products and iconic brands include OFF!®, Raid®, Glade®, Windex®, Scrubbing Bubbles®, Ziploc®, Mrs. Meyer’s® Clean Day, method®, Autan®, Baygon®, Mr Muscle®, Duck®, Lysoform® and more, and are in homes, schools and businesses in virtually every country worldwide. We’re a fifth-generation, family-owned and led company with 13,000 employees and operations in 70 countries. Founded in 1886 and headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin, we believe that a more sustainable, healthier and transparent world that inspires people and creates opportunities isn't just possible – it's our responsibility. SC Johnson includes both SC Johnson Professional, providing solutions to healthcare, industrial and institutional markets, and SC Johnson Lifestyle Brands, a growing house of like-minded brands working together for bold, transformative growth. Learn more about SC Johnson on our LinkedIn “Life” tab, at https://scjohnson.com or https://jobs.scjohnson.com.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,517
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrara-.jpeg
Ferrara
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scjohnson.jpeg
SC Johnson
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ferrara
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SC Johnson
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrara in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SC Johnson in 2026.

Incident History — Ferrara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SC Johnson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SC Johnson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrara-.jpeg
Ferrara
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption (timed to maximize pressure during peak season)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scjohnson.jpeg
SC Johnson
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SC Johnson company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ferrara company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ferrara company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SC Johnson company has not reported any.

In the current year, SC Johnson company and Ferrara company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Ferrara company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SC Johnson company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ferrara company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SC Johnson company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SC Johnson company nor Ferrara company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ferrara company nor SC Johnson company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SC Johnson company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ferrara company.

SC Johnson company employs more people globally than Ferrara company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ferrara nor SC Johnson holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References