Comparison Overview

Ferrara

VS

Kimberly-Clark

Ferrara

404 W Harrison St, Suite 650, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60607
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 650 and 699

We are Ferrara, an undisputed leader in sugar confections. Ferrara is #1 in the category in the US with ambitions of being the global leader by leveraging our focus, capabilities, and brand portfolio to drive category development for our community, customer, and consumers. Our diverse portfolio of two dozen brands includes SweeTARTS®, Trolli®, BRACH'S®, Black Forest® and NERDS®, along with iconic favorites like Lemonhead®, Red Hots® and Now and Later®. Headquartered in Chicago, Ferrara has over 4,000 dedicated employees and an operational network of over a dozen locations in North America that includes manufacturing, distribution, and R&D facilities.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 2,064
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Kimberly-Clark

351 Phelps Dr, None, Irving, TX, US, 75038
Last Update: 2026-01-20

As a Kimberly-Clark employee, you have an opportunity to impact billions of lives through the products we make, the workplaces we create and the communities we serve. The proof is in our purpose – Here, we are creating Better Care for a Better World and it starts with YOU! Learn more about us and see what inspires you, careersatkc.com. Through collaborative teams that push boundaries and endless opportunities to work with some of the world’s most recognized brands, at Kimberly-Clark you and your purpose are in the driver seat of your career. Huggies®. Kleenex®. Andrex®. Scott®. Kotex®. Poise®. Depend®. The proof is in our products – For 150 years, our brands have been brought to market by a team of purpose-led innovators dedicated to creating Better Care for a Better World. And it takes the right people—in the right jobs and the right place—to make that happen. Join our 45,000+ employees who are changing the world for the better and generously giving back to communities and causes around the globe. Better Care for a Better World starts by taking care of you and giving you what you need to succeed. We’re dedicated to breaking down barriers to speed decision making and creating a workplace with relentless focus on our consumers and growing our people, like you. The proof is in our people – we've been rated as one of Forbes 2022 World's Best Employers, and it's because of the caring people and the amazing culture that brings out the best in everyone. Join our employees in our amazing culture that brings out the best in everyone. To make Kimberly-Clark's social media channels an engaging, respectful environment, here are our Community Guidelines: https://www.kimberly-clark.com/en-us/company/community-guidelines

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 34,282
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrara-.jpeg
Ferrara
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimberly-clark.jpeg
Kimberly-Clark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ferrara
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kimberly-Clark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrara in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kimberly-Clark in 2026.

Incident History — Ferrara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kimberly-Clark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimberly-Clark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferrara-.jpeg
Ferrara
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption (timed to maximize pressure during peak season)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimberly-clark.jpeg
Kimberly-Clark
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kimberly-Clark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ferrara company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ferrara company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Kimberly-Clark company.

In the current year, Kimberly-Clark company and Ferrara company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Ferrara company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Kimberly-Clark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Kimberly-Clark company and Ferrara company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Kimberly-Clark company nor Ferrara company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ferrara company nor Kimberly-Clark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ferrara company nor Kimberly-Clark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kimberly-Clark company employs more people globally than Ferrara company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ferrara nor Kimberly-Clark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H