Comparison Overview

Fernbank Museum of Natural History

VS

Glenbow

Fernbank Museum of Natural History

767 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30307, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fernbankmuseum.org

Discover a world of wow at Atlanta’s science and nature experience. Come in, go out, and see what’s new as you explore 75 acres of the great outdoors, three levels of indoor science adventures, and 3D movies so amazing, they require a 4-story giant screen. Our Mission Fernbank’s mission is to ignite a passion for science, nature and human culture through exploration and discovery.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Glenbow

130 9 Avenue SE, Calgary, Alberta, T2G0P3, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.glenbow.org

Glenbow is a place of confluence: a meeting point for people and communities to join a flow of ideas, knowledge, opinions, and experiences. Our exceptional collection of art, objects, and belongings represents the people and ideas that have shaped our region. We are committed to expanding the accessibility and impact of art and culture in our community through exhibitions and programs that provide meaningful experiences for all visitors. Glenbow is currently completing a comprehensive renovation of its 1970s building in downtown Calgary, transforming the eight-storey, 312,000 square foot space into an accessible, dynamic community hub: the JR Shaw Centre for Arts & Culture. This renovation will establish Glenbow as a vibrant urban destination that engages with the city around it – a home for creativity, innovation, and community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fernbank-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Fernbank Museum of Natural History
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenbow-museum.jpeg
Glenbow
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fernbank Museum of Natural History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glenbow
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fernbank Museum of Natural History in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glenbow in 2026.

Incident History — Fernbank Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fernbank Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glenbow (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glenbow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fernbank-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Fernbank Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenbow-museum.jpeg
Glenbow
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fernbank Museum of Natural History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Glenbow company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glenbow company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fernbank Museum of Natural History company.

In the current year, Glenbow company and Fernbank Museum of Natural History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glenbow company nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glenbow company nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glenbow company nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History company nor Glenbow company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History company nor Glenbow company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fernbank Museum of Natural History company employs more people globally than Glenbow company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History nor Glenbow holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References