Comparison Overview

Ferla Paolo Photography

VS

Koval

Ferla Paolo Photography

56 Hill Avenue, Bristol, BS3 4SU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

About www.ferlapaolo.com “It’s one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it’s another thing to make a portrait of who they are.” – Paul Caponigro Mission The goal is to create breath taking imagery and bring out the beauty of everything around us Description Ferla Paolo Photography is a limited Liability Company built around the one passion for image making in the creative field of photography.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Koval

200 Clinton St, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Peter Koval provides professional photography specializing in fashion, beauty, celebrity portraiture, and advertising. He has a unique and well-rounded fine art and art direction background that enriches his photo shoots and gives his images a unique perspective. Peter Koval's photography is commissioned regularly by magazines in the U.S. and abroad, and for many fashion, celebrity, and advertising clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferla-paolo-photography.jpeg
Ferla Paolo Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/koval-photographer.jpeg
Koval
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ferla Paolo Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Koval
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferla Paolo Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Koval in 2025.

Incident History — Ferla Paolo Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferla Paolo Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Koval (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Koval cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferla-paolo-photography.jpeg
Ferla Paolo Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/koval-photographer.jpeg
Koval
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ferla Paolo Photography company and Koval company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Koval company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ferla Paolo Photography company.

In the current year, Koval company and Ferla Paolo Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Koval company nor Ferla Paolo Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Koval company nor Ferla Paolo Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Koval company nor Ferla Paolo Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography company nor Koval company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography company nor Koval company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ferla Paolo Photography nor Koval holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N