Comparison Overview

Ferdio

VS

Harrison Agency

Ferdio

Vesterbrogade 20, Copenhagen V, 1620, DK
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

We are an infographic agency doing visual storytelling. We transform data and information into captivating visuals and makes it easier to understand and remember. We are visual storytellers that inform and inspires your audience. Some of our services: - Reports - SoMe visual content - Video and animation - Annual reports - Infographic websites - Presentation design - Publications - Digital dashboard design

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Harrison Agency

undefined, Brighton, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Harrison Agency was formed in 2003 when Chris Harrison decided to set up his own studio after years working in some of the world’s biggest agencies, including Saatchi & Saatchi, where his career began in 1991. At heart we’re ideas people, in love with creativity in all its disciplines. Thinking, sketching, experimenting and designing – it's in our personalities, not just our job descriptions. Therefore it's no exaggeration to say we're in our element when it comes to helping clients solve their design and branding challenges. From branding for start-ups to brand consultancy for larger organisations, we work with a diverse range of clients, including orchestras, arts festivals, national charities, financial services brands, government agencies and more.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferdio.jpeg
Ferdio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-agency.jpeg
Harrison Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ferdio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harrison Agency
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferdio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harrison Agency in 2025.

Incident History — Ferdio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferdio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harrison Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harrison Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferdio.jpeg
Ferdio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-agency.jpeg
Harrison Agency
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ferdio company and Harrison Agency company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Harrison Agency company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ferdio company.

In the current year, Harrison Agency company and Ferdio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harrison Agency company nor Ferdio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Harrison Agency company nor Ferdio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Harrison Agency company nor Ferdio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ferdio company nor Harrison Agency company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ferdio company nor Harrison Agency company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ferdio company employs more people globally than Harrison Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ferdio nor Harrison Agency holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X