Comparison Overview

Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC

VS

Justice at Work

Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC

2805 Wehrle Drive, Williamsville, New York, 14221, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

Our firm practices in the areas of estate planning, probate, estate and trust administration, and real estate. Our approach is somewhat different from the traditional law firm. We believe that our product is "peace-of-mind."​ Toward that goal, it is important for our clients to be aware of all estate planning options, and to fully understand the details of their particular plan. As a result, we see ourselves more as educators than advisors. To reinforce the client's peace-of-mind, our legal documents are written in plain-English, and every sentence is fully reviewed and explained. For most work, we provide legal services on a fixed-fee basis. We have found that such an arrangement (as compared to hourly billing) allows a client to take the time to get the plan right ... without worrying about increasing the bill if they make a phone call or request an extra meeting. Finally, our initial planning meeting with a client is without charge. Unlike some law firms, however, this "complimentary"​ meeting is very productive, resulting in a specific list of planning options, along with the fees to implement such options. Attorney Advertising

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Justice at Work

33 Harrison Ave., Boston, 02111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Justice at Work’s mission is to support workers in low-wage jobs in exercising their power. We strengthen organizing by providing labor-and-employment legal services, training, and strategic guidance to workers’ organizations. Justice At Work envisions all people exercising their power at work to ensure fair pay, safety, and dignity. To accomplish our vision, we: a) build capacity through legal training/education and technical assistance; b) provide direct legal services as well as access to legal resources and advocacy; and c) spearhead and/or support workplace-related law reform efforts to improve working conditions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenster-&-lewis.jpeg
Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justice-at-work.jpeg
Justice at Work
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Justice at Work
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Justice at Work in 2025.

Incident History — Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Justice at Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Justice at Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenster-&-lewis.jpeg
Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justice-at-work.jpeg
Justice at Work
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Justice at Work company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Justice at Work company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company.

In the current year, Justice at Work company and Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Justice at Work company nor Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Justice at Work company nor Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Justice at Work company nor Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company nor Justice at Work company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company nor Justice at Work company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Justice at Work company employs more people globally than Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fenster, Lewis & Good, LLC nor Justice at Work holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X