Comparison Overview

Fenner Photography

VS

INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL

Fenner Photography

P.O. Box 9190 Reno, NV 89507, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

At Fenner Photography we specialize in the unique. We capture the true essence of who you are and the emotion of the occasion. We want to be with you every step of the way from your Engagement to the birth of your first child and all of the milestones that life brings. www.FennerPhotoReno.com 775.544.2466 Reno, Sparks, Tahoe and Northern Nevada Wedding, Gay Wedding, Birth, Family and Senior Photography Show more Show less

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL

127 W 83rd St, PO Box 874, New York, NY, US, 10024
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

The International Photographic Council (IPC) is a civil society organization formally associated with the United Nations Department of Global Communications and is committed to promoting the power of photography as a universal means of communication. Through our global community of photographers, educators, and industry experts, we strive to foster intercultural understanding and collaboration through visual storytelling.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenner-photography.jpeg
Fenner Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-photographic-council.jpeg
INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fenner Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fenner Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL in 2025.

Incident History — Fenner Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fenner Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenner-photography.jpeg
Fenner Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-photographic-council.jpeg
INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fenner Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fenner Photography company.

In the current year, INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company and Fenner Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company nor Fenner Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company nor Fenner Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company nor Fenner Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fenner Photography company nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fenner Photography company nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL company employs more people globally than Fenner Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fenner Photography nor INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNCIL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N