Comparison Overview

Fenner Drives

VS

Fabbaloo

Fenner Drives

187 West Airport Road, Lititz, PA, US, 17543
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fenner Drives has developed a unique portfolio of products for power transmission, motion transfer and conveying applications. Recognized worldwide for our expertise and innovation in manufacturing technology, we consistently blend reliability, quality and value in our products. As part of our commitment to provide unsurpassed technical support and service, we maintain extensive engineering, development and testing facilities. Fenner Drives employs over 200 people, has production facilities in Manheim, PA and Wilmington, NC and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fenner PLC. With over 4,000 employees worldwide, Fenner PLC is a world leader in reinforced polymer technology. Count on Fenner Drives, we've got the right product for your application. Visit us at www.fennerdrives.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 238
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fabbaloo

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fabbaloo tracks developments in 3D Printing with daily news and insightful analysis on industry happenings. We believe in a future where everyone can easily make any 3D objects by using inexpensive desktop equipment, much like we use inkjet printers today for two-dimensional paper objects. It's also known as Desktop Manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping or Digital Manufacturing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenner-drives.jpeg
Fenner Drives
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fabbaloo.jpeg
Fabbaloo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fenner Drives
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fabbaloo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fenner Drives in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fabbaloo in 2025.

Incident History — Fenner Drives (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fenner Drives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fabbaloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fabbaloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenner-drives.jpeg
Fenner Drives
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fabbaloo.jpeg
Fabbaloo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fenner Drives company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fabbaloo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fabbaloo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fenner Drives company.

In the current year, Fabbaloo company and Fenner Drives company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fabbaloo company nor Fenner Drives company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fabbaloo company nor Fenner Drives company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fabbaloo company nor Fenner Drives company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fenner Drives company nor Fabbaloo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fenner Drives company nor Fabbaloo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fenner Drives company employs more people globally than Fabbaloo company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fenner Drives nor Fabbaloo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H