Comparison Overview

Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP

VS

Global Law Office

Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP

812 San Antonio Street, Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP is a premier boutique law firm dedicated to the community banking industry. The firm represents banks, thrifts and other financial institutions, as well as their investors, directors and executive officers, in a full range of corporate, transactional, securities and regulatory matters confronting the financial services industry. For more information, please visit www.fkhpartners.com.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Global Law Office

15 & 20/F, Tower 1, China Central Place, Beijing, Beijing, 100025, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The history of Global Law Office dates back to 1984, when it became the first law firm in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) to take an international perspective on its business, fully embracing the outside world. In today's global economy, we continue to set the pace as the PRC’s most innovative and progressive law firm. In doing so, we build on the energy and creativity of our highly qualified professionals, most of whom have gained qualifications or hands-on experience in law schools and firms throughout Asia, North America, Europe and Australia. Our clients are the most important part of our business. We have attracted clients from all parts of the world, working in countless industries and market areas. Our value is delivered to our international and domestic clients through our deep knowledge and experience across the full range of practice areas and industries affected by Chinese law. As one of the country’s most well-established and respected firms, we can bring our clients the legal and cultural understanding needed for long-term success in the PRC.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenimore-kay-harrison-&-ford-llp.jpeg
Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/环球律师事务所.jpeg
Global Law Office
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Global Law Office
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Law Office in 2025.

Incident History — Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Global Law Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Law Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenimore-kay-harrison-&-ford-llp.jpeg
Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/环球律师事务所.jpeg
Global Law Office
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Global Law Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Global Law Office company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company.

In the current year, Global Law Office company and Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Global Law Office company nor Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Global Law Office company nor Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Global Law Office company nor Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company nor Global Law Office company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company nor Global Law Office company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Global Law Office company employs more people globally than Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP nor Global Law Office holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X