Comparison Overview

Fenice Media Ltd

VS

Scidoc Publishers

Fenice Media Ltd

undefined, Birmingham, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Fenice Media is a UK-based media group with an international presence, the company provides news & resources to the legal and travel sectors. Fenice Media originally launched Corporate LiveWire to provide business professionals with information on the latest news and developments around the globe. The Luxury Travel Guide was later incorporated to provide the addition of luxury travel and lifestyle information. The online content, printed books and digital magazines are now considered some of the leading resources for this exclusive market.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scidoc Publishers

16192 Coastal Highway, Lewes, 19958, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

SciDoc Publications was established in 2012 with sole motive to disseminate knowledge amongst the scientific community. We as an Open Access publisher are on the way to be the world leader in the provision of STM (Science, Technology and Medicine) Open Access content. This publishing model allows us to reach millions of readers and give them access to scientific publications online free of charge. Through Open Access we intend to remove all barriers that traditional publishing models imposed. Keeping up to the pace of the 21st century and the vast global research scenario, we ensure accelerated distribution of new developments to the entire scientific community.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenice-media-ltd.jpeg
Fenice Media Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scidoc-publishers.jpeg
Scidoc Publishers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fenice Media Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scidoc Publishers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fenice Media Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scidoc Publishers in 2025.

Incident History — Fenice Media Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fenice Media Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scidoc Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scidoc Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fenice-media-ltd.jpeg
Fenice Media Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scidoc-publishers.jpeg
Scidoc Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Fenice Media Ltd company and Scidoc Publishers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Scidoc Publishers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fenice Media Ltd company.

In the current year, Scidoc Publishers company and Fenice Media Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Fenice Media Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Fenice Media Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Fenice Media Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd company nor Scidoc Publishers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd company nor Scidoc Publishers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fenice Media Ltd company employs more people globally than Scidoc Publishers company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fenice Media Ltd nor Scidoc Publishers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.