Comparison Overview

Fellowship House

VS

Fernbrook Family Center

Fellowship House

5711 S. Dixie Highway, South Miami, FL 33143, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Fellowship House is a private, not-for-profit psychosocial rehabilitation center for individuals who experience severe and persistent psychiatric disabilities including those with co-occurring substance abuse disorders. It is the mission of Fellowship House to assist adults with severe and persistent psychiatric disabilities and individuals that also have co-occurring substance abuse disorders, achieve the maximum level of community integration and self reliance. This is accomplished by providing a comprehensive continuum of programs and services offering supportive opportunities for vocational and social rehabilitation as well as residential options, psychiatric and case management services. Fellowship House is committed to helping the persons served, who are called “members”, to better understand their illness, develop coping strategies, improve their quality of life and experience recovery.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fernbrook Family Center

2575 Harvest Lane NW, Owatonna, 55060, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At Fernbrook Family Center, we believe in using innovative strategies to build relationships and transform lives. We do this by meeting our clients where they’re at and then working with them to develop life and relationship skills that enable them to build healthy relationships in their families, at work, and in school. When it comes to delivering our services, we are most successful when we work with the individual or a child directly with their family, in school, or in the community environment. We go beyond traditional outpatient therapy and deliver our services where and when issues are occurring: in the home, in the child’s school or daycare, and in the community. Our relationship-based counseling approach focuses not only on the individual client, but also on equipping their family with resources and solutions to support their loved one. Bring your unique interests, skills, and passion for mental health to a role where you’ll have the opportunity to make an impact on someone’s life. Fernbrook is the place where continual growth and being creative is encouraged. Fernbrook values the importance of continuing education and offers flexible schedules for those in school or working towards their bachelors, master, and or PhD’s. We are looking for innovative thinkers that are passionate about working in the mental health field. Bring your unique interests, skills, and passion for mental health to a role where you’ll have the opportunity to make an impact on someone’s life.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fellowship-house.jpeg
Fellowship House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fernbrook-family-center.jpeg
Fernbrook Family Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fellowship House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fernbrook Family Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fellowship House in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fernbrook Family Center in 2026.

Incident History — Fellowship House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fellowship House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fernbrook Family Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fernbrook Family Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fellowship-house.jpeg
Fellowship House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fernbrook-family-center.jpeg
Fernbrook Family Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fellowship House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fernbrook Family Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fernbrook Family Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fellowship House company.

In the current year, Fernbrook Family Center company and Fellowship House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fernbrook Family Center company nor Fellowship House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fernbrook Family Center company nor Fellowship House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fernbrook Family Center company nor Fellowship House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fellowship House company nor Fernbrook Family Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fellowship House company nor Fernbrook Family Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fellowship House company employs more people globally than Fernbrook Family Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fellowship House nor Fernbrook Family Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N