Comparison Overview

Fellenzer Engineering, LLP

VS

Ringtech

Fellenzer Engineering, LLP

22 Mulberry St, Middletown, New York, 10940, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fellenzer Engineering, LLP, a nationally recognized engineering firm, leads the Hudson Valley in innovative engineering consultation, analysis and design. Our award-winning designs have earned us work with some of the largest commercial facilities in the area, including Giants Stadium and Newark International Airport, along with numerous multi-year Term Contracts with New York State’s Dormitory Authority and Office of General Services, The US Postal Service and The Department of Veterans Affairs. Our half century of success is a direct result of our corporate values, our intelligent and creative staff and our focus on exceptional client service. Our members come from some of the country’s most prestigious engineering schools and have a passion for creativity and design. Respect, integrity, and accountability guide our staff through each project - insuring each client a customized and cost-effective solution to their engineering needs. Strategically located in the Mid-Hudson region, we work with clients from Pennsylvania to Connecticut, Albany to Central New Jersey and everywhere in between. We are licensed in New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ringtech

8975 San Pablo Drive, Goodyear, Arizona, 85338, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Ringtech supplies manufacturing technology and machinery to the jewelry, medical and aerospace industries. We specialize in Custom solutions for wedding band, bangle, watch and other items in both precious metals and aerospace materials, Using state of the art technologies and solutions that look out side the box, we are able to find methods of production that suit individual customers needs

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fellenzer-engineering-llp.jpeg
Fellenzer Engineering, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ringtech.jpeg
Ringtech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fellenzer Engineering, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ringtech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fellenzer Engineering, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ringtech in 2025.

Incident History — Fellenzer Engineering, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fellenzer Engineering, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ringtech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ringtech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fellenzer-engineering-llp.jpeg
Fellenzer Engineering, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ringtech.jpeg
Ringtech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ringtech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ringtech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company.

In the current year, Ringtech company and Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ringtech company nor Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ringtech company nor Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ringtech company nor Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company nor Ringtech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company nor Ringtech company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fellenzer Engineering, LLP company employs more people globally than Ringtech company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fellenzer Engineering, LLP nor Ringtech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H