Comparison Overview

Federation of American Scientists

VS

UHack Tasmania

Federation of American Scientists

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) works to provide science-based analysis of and solutions to protect against catastrophic threats to national and international security. Specifically, FAS works to reduce the spread and number of nuclear weapons, prevent nuclear and radiological terrorism, promote high standards for nuclear energy’s safety and security, illuminate government secrecy practices, as well as track and eliminate the global illicit trade of conventional, nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. FAS was founded in 1945 by many of the Manhattan Project scientists who wanted to prevent nuclear war and is one of the longest serving organizations in the world dedicated to reducing nuclear threats and informing the public debate by providing technically-based research and analysis on these issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

UHack Tasmania

Tasmania, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

UHack is one of Australia's leading Hackathons! UHack is a fast-paced three-day innovation competition, that encourages you and your team to think outside the box, creating business ideas and developing solutions for real world problems. UHack is open to students, staff of the University and members of the public, and will be run over the weekend of Friday 3rd to Sunday 5th of September 2021. All participants are invited to join “in person” at their nearest location in Hobart, Launceston or Burnie. https://uhack2021.azureedge.net/ UHack is free to enter, with significant cash and other prizes, as well as providing mentoring from industry leaders, team-building opportunities, and the potential to turn your idea into a reality!

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federation-of-american-scientists.jpeg
Federation of American Scientists
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uhack-tasmania.jpeg
UHack Tasmania
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federation of American Scientists
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UHack Tasmania
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federation of American Scientists in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UHack Tasmania in 2025.

Incident History — Federation of American Scientists (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federation of American Scientists cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UHack Tasmania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UHack Tasmania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federation-of-american-scientists.jpeg
Federation of American Scientists
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uhack-tasmania.jpeg
UHack Tasmania
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UHack Tasmania company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Federation of American Scientists company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UHack Tasmania company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Federation of American Scientists company has not reported any.

In the current year, UHack Tasmania company and Federation of American Scientists company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UHack Tasmania company nor Federation of American Scientists company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UHack Tasmania company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Federation of American Scientists company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UHack Tasmania company nor Federation of American Scientists company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Federation of American Scientists company nor UHack Tasmania company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UHack Tasmania company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Federation of American Scientists company.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor UHack Tasmania holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X