Comparison Overview

Federation of American Scientists

VS

Center for Global Development

Federation of American Scientists

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) works to provide science-based analysis of and solutions to protect against catastrophic threats to national and international security. Specifically, FAS works to reduce the spread and number of nuclear weapons, prevent nuclear and radiological terrorism, promote high standards for nuclear energy’s safety and security, illuminate government secrecy practices, as well as track and eliminate the global illicit trade of conventional, nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. FAS was founded in 1945 by many of the Manhattan Project scientists who wanted to prevent nuclear war and is one of the longest serving organizations in the world dedicated to reducing nuclear threats and informing the public debate by providing technically-based research and analysis on these issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Global Development

2055 L Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Over the past two decades, the Center for Global Development has maintained an unwavering focus on providing independent non-partisan research that has driven major changes in global development policy and practice. Our staff, located in Washington, D.C. and London, are our most valuable asset in achieving our mission to reduce global poverty and inequality. CGD seeks highly qualified and deeply dedicated colleagues to further our research and program goals, communications and outreach efforts, as well as to support organizational operations. We are committed to transparency, diversity, and professional and personal integrity. We value mutual respect, a collegial work place, and a healthy sense of humor.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 215
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federation-of-american-scientists.jpeg
Federation of American Scientists
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-global-development.jpeg
Center for Global Development
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federation of American Scientists
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Global Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federation of American Scientists in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Global Development in 2025.

Incident History — Federation of American Scientists (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federation of American Scientists cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Global Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Global Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federation-of-american-scientists.jpeg
Federation of American Scientists
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-global-development.jpeg
Center for Global Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Global Development company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Federation of American Scientists company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Global Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Federation of American Scientists company.

In the current year, Center for Global Development company and Federation of American Scientists company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Global Development company nor Federation of American Scientists company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Global Development company nor Federation of American Scientists company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Global Development company nor Federation of American Scientists company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Federation of American Scientists company nor Center for Global Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Federation of American Scientists company nor Center for Global Development company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Global Development company employs more people globally than Federation of American Scientists company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federation of American Scientists nor Center for Global Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X