Comparison Overview

Federal Trade Commission

VS

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, 20580, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

This is the official LinkedIn account of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC is a bipartisan federal agency with a unique dual mission to protect consumers and promote competition. For more than 100 years, our collegial and consensus-driven agency has championed the interests of American consumers. As we begin our second century, the FTC is dedicated to advancing consumer interests while encouraging innovation and competition in our dynamic economy. To connect with the Commission, see http://www.ftc.gov/stay-connected. PRIVACY NOTICE This is the Federal Trade Commission’s LinkedIn account. LinkedIn is controlled and operated by a third party; it is not a government website or application. The FTC’s privacy policy does not apply. Although the FTC does not routinely maintain, use, or share personally identifiable information from this site, LinkedIn and its partners may collect your information and use tracking technology. Please refer to LinkedIn’s Privacy Policy (https://www.linkedin.com/legal/privacy-policy) to learn more about how the company may use your personal information. Access the FTC’s official web site at www.ftc.gov and its privacy policy at www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy. Note: The FTC does not collect personal information through this LinkedIn page. COMMENT POLICY We welcome your comments and thoughts about the information on this page. If you do have something to say, please be courteous and respectful to others. We won’t review or edit any comments before they are posted, but we will delete any comments that: - contain spam or are off-topic - use vulgar language or offensive terms that target specific groups or contain personal attacks - are sales pitches, promotions or links to commercial sites - spread clearly misleading or false information - include personal information, like home addresses, social security numbers and emails, etc.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,211
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

601 12th Street South, None, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22202
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people by preventing threats and disruptions in the transportation sector, while enhancing the overall passenger experience. 🔹 Mission: Safeguard transportation systems and prevent security threats 🔹 Vision: Achieve a secure and resilient transportation network 🔹 Values: Integrity, Excellence, Accountability, and Innovation More than 60,000 people around the world make up #TeamTSA and ensure the safety of millions of people each day as they travel by plane, train, automobile or ferry. From the officers you see on the frontlines to our cybersecurity and mission support teams, we’re working hard to combat evolving threats and keep you safe. Join us in our commitment to a more secure travel experience. For more information, visit tsa.gov.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,759
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-trade-commission.jpeg
Federal Trade Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federal Trade Commission
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Federal Trade Commission has 21.95% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2025.

Incident History — Federal Trade Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Trade Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-trade-commission.jpeg
Federal Trade Commission
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a software vulnerability in smart contracts
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., unauthorized loans, employment fraud, government benefits fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Federal Trade Commission company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Federal Trade Commission company.

In the current year, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported more cyber incidents than Federal Trade Commission company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Federal Trade Commission company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Federal Trade Commission company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Federal Trade Commission company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Federal Trade Commission company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Federal Trade Commission company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company employs more people globally than Federal Trade Commission company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federal Trade Commission nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N