Comparison Overview

Federal National Council

VS

Planning and Development District III

Federal National Council

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

المجلس الوطني الاتحادي هو السلطة الاتحادية الرابعة من حيث الترتيب في سلم السلطات الاتحادية الخمس المنصوص عليها في الدستور وهي: - المجلس الأعلى للاتحاد. - رئيس الاتحاد ونائبه. - مجلس وزراء الاتحاد. - المجلس الوطني الاتحادي - القضاء الاتحادي. وعقد المجلس الوطني الاتحادي أولى جلساته بتاريخ 12/2/1972. تشكيل المجلس: يتشكل المجلس الوطني الاتحادي من أربعين عضواً ، يتوزعون على الإمارات بحسب الدستور كما يلي: - (8) مقاعد لإمارة أبوظبي. - (8) مقاعد لإمارة دبي. - (6) مقاعد لإمارة الشارقة. - (6) مقاعد لإمارة رأس الخيمة. - (4) مقاعد لإمارة عجمان. - (4) مقاعد لإمارة والفجيرة. - (4) مقاعد لإمارة أم القيوين.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Planning and Development District III

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Planning and Development District III is a voluntary association of county, municipal and Tribal governments. Its mission is to provide comprehensive development assistance to its membership and the private sector. The district offers a full range of services that help the region maintain public services and expand economic opportunities. The association is governed by a committee of elected officials, non-profit organization representatives and business interests. The district employs a professional staff with extensive experience in a variety of development and technical fields.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-national-council.jpeg
Federal National Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planning-and-development-district-iii.jpeg
Planning and Development District III
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federal National Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Planning and Development District III
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal National Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Planning and Development District III in 2025.

Incident History — Federal National Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal National Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Planning and Development District III (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Planning and Development District III cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-national-council.jpeg
Federal National Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planning-and-development-district-iii.jpeg
Planning and Development District III
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Federal National Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Planning and Development District III company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Planning and Development District III company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Federal National Council company.

In the current year, Planning and Development District III company and Federal National Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Planning and Development District III company nor Federal National Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Planning and Development District III company nor Federal National Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Planning and Development District III company nor Federal National Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Federal National Council company nor Planning and Development District III company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Federal National Council company nor Planning and Development District III company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Federal National Council company employs more people globally than Planning and Development District III company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federal National Council nor Planning and Development District III holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N