Comparison Overview

Federal Contracts Company

VS

DC Municipal Consulting

Federal Contracts Company

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We are a leading supplier of heavy equipment sales and rentals to the federal government. We hold multiple GSA, BPA, and DLA contracts in the areas of heavy equipment and AG sales and rentals. We have a national reach, but a personal touch that makes government purchasing simple! GSA Contract: GS-03F-113DA

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DC Municipal Consulting

undefined, Dallas, Texas, 75225, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

DC Municipal Consulting (DCMC) was formed in August of 2017 as a women-owned firm specializing in consulting for local governments. DCMC has completed a number of projects for focusing on human resource management, executive recruitment, compensation and pay plan development, policy development, and grant application preparation. Successful projects include: Compensation/Pay Plan Review and Market Analysis - City of Fate, Texas City of Forney, Texas City of Heath, Texas City of Melissa, Texas (2019 and 2021) City of Mount Pleasant, Texas City of Royse City, Texas Executive Recruitment City of Josephine, Texas (City Administrator) City of Mount Pleasant, Texas (Police Chief, Building Official, Public Works Director/City Engineer, Parks Director, and Planner) Hiring Policy Development and Training - Town of Little Elm, Texas 360 Performance Review Survey Tool Creation and Administration - Town of Little Elm, Texas Grant Writing - City of Heath, Texas Job Description Development City of Heath, Texas City of Mount Pleasant, Texas Strategic Government Resources (SGR) Personnel Policy and Procedures Manual Rewrite - City of Abilene, Texas Purchasing Policy Training Development and Presentation - City of Abilene, Texas DC Municipal Consulting would be happy to discuss any projects needs you may have.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-contracts-company.jpeg
Federal Contracts Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-municipal-consulting.jpeg
DC Municipal Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federal Contracts Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DC Municipal Consulting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Contracts Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC Municipal Consulting in 2025.

Incident History — Federal Contracts Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Contracts Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DC Municipal Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC Municipal Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-contracts-company.jpeg
Federal Contracts Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-municipal-consulting.jpeg
DC Municipal Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Federal Contracts Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DC Municipal Consulting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DC Municipal Consulting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Federal Contracts Company company.

In the current year, DC Municipal Consulting company and Federal Contracts Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DC Municipal Consulting company nor Federal Contracts Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DC Municipal Consulting company nor Federal Contracts Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DC Municipal Consulting company nor Federal Contracts Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Federal Contracts Company company nor DC Municipal Consulting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Federal Contracts Company company nor DC Municipal Consulting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Federal Contracts Company company employs more people globally than DC Municipal Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federal Contracts Company nor DC Municipal Consulting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N