Comparison Overview

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon

VS

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon

Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://or.fd.org/

The Office of the Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon, operates under authority of the Criminal Justice Act of 1964 (CJA), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. It provides defense services in federal criminal cases and other covered matters to individuals who are financially unable to obtain adequate representation. A person’s eligibility for defender services is determined by the federal court. Defender organization attorneys may not engage in the private practice of law.

NAICS: 92211
NAICS Definition: Courts
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator

500 S. Duval St., Tallahassee, 32399-1900, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://flcourts.org

Florida's State Courts Administrator serves under the direction of the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court and the other six justices and oversees the operation of court initiatives and administrative functions. Additionally, the State Courts Administrator serves as the liaison between the court system and the legislative branch, the executive branch, the auxiliary agencies of the Court and the national court research and planning agencies. The Office of the State Courts Administrator was created on July 1, 1972.

NAICS: 92211
NAICS Definition: Courts
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fd-oregon.jpeg
Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-office-of-state-courts-administrator.jpeg
Florida Office of State Courts Administrator
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Office of State Courts Administrator
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon in 2025.

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Office of State Courts Administrator in 2025.

Incident History — Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Office of State Courts Administrator (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fd-oregon.jpeg
Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unknown (likely multi-vector due to diverse threat actors), Potential exploitation of systemic vulnerabilities in federal IT infrastructure
Motivation: Espionage, Criminal Exploitation (e.g., witness intimidation, investigation sabotage), Financial Gain (potential dark web data sales), Strategic Advantage (nation-state actors)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Espionage, disruption, or influence
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-office-of-state-courts-administrator.jpeg
Florida Office of State Courts Administrator
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company and Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has not reported any.

In the current year, Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company has reported more cyber incidents than Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company nor Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company.

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company employs more people globally than Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon company, reflecting its scale as a Administration of Justice.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in TykoDev cherry-studio-TykoFork 0.1. This issue affects the function redirectToAuthorization of the file /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server of the component OAuth Server Discovery. Such manipulation of the argument authorizationUrl leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in code-projects Question Paper Generator up to 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /selectquestionuser.php. This manipulation of the argument subid causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was found in alokjaiswal Hotel-Management-services-using-MYSQL-and-php up to 5f8b60a7aa6c06a5632de569d4e3f6a8cd82f76f. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /dishsub.php. The manipulation of the argument item.name results in cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in alokjaiswal Hotel-Management-services-using-MYSQL-and-php up to 5f8b60a7aa6c06a5632de569d4e3f6a8cd82f76f. Affected is an unknown function of the file /usersub.php of the component Request Pending Page. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in Verysync 微力同步 up to 2.21.3. This impacts an unknown function of the file /rest/f/api/resources/f96956469e7be39d/tmp/text.txt?override=false of the component Web Administration Module. Executing manipulation can lead to unrestricted upload. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References