Comparison Overview

FBK Legal

VS

Helton Law Group, APC

FBK Legal

Myasnitskaya, 48,, Moscow, 101990,, RU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

FBK Legal law firm is part of FBK Group, one of the oldest and largest audit and consulting companies in Russia. Our key service offerings include tax and legal services, support in M&A transactions and representing clients both in and out of court. Over 60 skilled lawyers and tax advisors work in FBK Legal. Our lawyers have an excellent education, extensive experience and well-deserved reputation among both clients and colleagues. The services provided by FBK Legal and FBK group of companies fully comply with the requirements of international standards. Since August 1, 2014 FBK has gained its membership in Grant Thornton International, the network of independent audit and consulting firms. FBK Legal and its lawyers are recommended for co-operation in key legal and commercial areas by international and Russian legal rankings (The Legal 500 EMEA, Chambers Europe, Chambers Global, Best Lawyers, Pravo.Ru-300).

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Helton Law Group, APC

1590 Corporate Dr, Costa Mesa, California, 92626, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Helton Law Group is an innovative legal resource center created to support and strengthen hospital revenue cycle operations. Founded over 20 years ago, Helton's mission has always been to make healthcare better for everyone - and we do that every day by helping our clients resolve reimbursement issues, contract in ways to avoid problems, and strengthen payor/provider relationships in the process. Helton works closely with its provider clients to preserve margins by improving systems, identifying inefficiencies and shortening the revenue cycle on future similar claims. Helton supports and focuses on its client’s revenue cycle priorities, objectives and initiatives. Helton complies with all 2021 federal compliance and California state labor laws.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helton-law-group.jpeg
Helton Law Group, APC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FBK Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Helton Law Group, APC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FBK Legal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Helton Law Group, APC in 2025.

Incident History — FBK Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FBK Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Helton Law Group, APC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Helton Law Group, APC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fbk-legal.jpeg
FBK Legal
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helton-law-group.jpeg
Helton Law Group, APC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FBK Legal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Helton Law Group, APC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Helton Law Group, APC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FBK Legal company.

In the current year, Helton Law Group, APC company and FBK Legal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC company nor FBK Legal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC company nor FBK Legal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC company nor FBK Legal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FBK Legal company nor Helton Law Group, APC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FBK Legal company nor Helton Law Group, APC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Helton Law Group, APC company employs more people globally than FBK Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FBK Legal nor Helton Law Group, APC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X