Comparison Overview

Fayetteville Free Library

VS

Indiana Free Library

Fayetteville Free Library

300 Orchard Street, Fayetteville, NY, 13066, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

It is the mission of the Fayetteville Free Library to provide free and open access to ideas and information. The Fayetteville Free Library is a member library of the Onondaga County Public Library system. The FFL provides programs, events, and classes for the public. We have computer labs, a cafe, wifi and community room. We also have a state of the art digital media lab, as well as the first ever makerspace in a public library in the U.S. Please visit www.fflib.org for more about the FFL and be sure to follow us on facebook for updates (http:www.facebook.com/fayfreelibrary) and on twitter (@fayettevillelib) for important information about programs and services.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Indiana Free Library

845 Philadelphia St, Indiana, 15701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

The Indiana Free Library offers public library services to the Indiana School District with a population of 32,924 residents. Regular hours are M & W; 10am-9pm, T & Th; 10am-6pm, Sat; 10am-5pm. Closed Friday and Sunday. Programs are offered for all ages. Please check the website for details and library information www.indianafreelibrary.org.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fayetteville-free-library.jpeg
Fayetteville Free Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Indiana Free Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fayetteville Free Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indiana Free Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fayetteville Free Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indiana Free Library in 2025.

Incident History — Fayetteville Free Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fayetteville Free Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indiana Free Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indiana Free Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fayetteville-free-library.jpeg
Fayetteville Free Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Indiana Free Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indiana Free Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fayetteville Free Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Indiana Free Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fayetteville Free Library company.

In the current year, Indiana Free Library company and Fayetteville Free Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indiana Free Library company nor Fayetteville Free Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indiana Free Library company nor Fayetteville Free Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indiana Free Library company nor Fayetteville Free Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library company nor Indiana Free Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library company nor Indiana Free Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fayetteville Free Library company employs more people globally than Indiana Free Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fayetteville Free Library nor Indiana Free Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H