Comparison Overview

Fatboy the original

VS

Padma's Plantation

Fatboy the original

Het Zuiderkruis 3, Den Bosch, Noord-Brabant, 5215 MV, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Although the Original beanbag is without a doubt Fatboy's greatest hero, Fatboy is much more than a beanbag. For more than 20 years, Fatboy has been playing with the rules of design – and giving everyday classics their own twist. The result is a surprising indoor and outdoor collection, ranging from lamps to air loungers, from modular outdoor sofas to oversized hammocks. Each product has its own character, although you immediately recognize them as a Fatboy design: quirky, inventive and of high quality. Every item is made with the purpose in mind to put a smile on your face.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Padma's Plantation

391 Wegner, West Chicago, IL 60185, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Padma's Plantation is a nature-inspired company that focuses on crafting furniture of natural materials including renewable resources like bamboo, rattan, and abaca to create fine furniture and accessories that evoke the tropics and all it entails. Like the easy-going, laid back style enjoyed by those who live in warm climates, Padma's Plantation designs are casual and comfortable.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fatboy-the-original.jpeg
Fatboy the original
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/padma's-plantation.jpeg
Padma's Plantation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fatboy the original
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Padma's Plantation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fatboy the original in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Padma's Plantation in 2025.

Incident History — Fatboy the original (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fatboy the original cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Padma's Plantation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Padma's Plantation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fatboy-the-original.jpeg
Fatboy the original
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/padma's-plantation.jpeg
Padma's Plantation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fatboy the original company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Padma's Plantation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Padma's Plantation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fatboy the original company.

In the current year, Padma's Plantation company and Fatboy the original company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Padma's Plantation company nor Fatboy the original company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Padma's Plantation company nor Fatboy the original company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Padma's Plantation company nor Fatboy the original company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fatboy the original company nor Padma's Plantation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fatboy the original company nor Padma's Plantation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fatboy the original company employs more people globally than Padma's Plantation company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fatboy the original nor Padma's Plantation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.