Comparison Overview

Fast Company

VS

Equinix

Fast Company

7 World Trade Center, New York, 10006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Fast Company is the world’s leading business media brand, with an editorial focus on innovation in technology, leadership, world changing ideas, creativity, and design. Written for and about the most progressive business leaders, Fast Company inspires readers to think expansively, lead with purpose, embrace change, and shape the future of business.

NAICS: 51913
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 3,606
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Equinix

One Lagoon Drive, Redwood City, California, 94065, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849

Equinix (Nasdaq: EQIX) is the world’s digital infrastructure company™, enabling digital leaders to harness a trusted platform to bring together and interconnect the foundational infrastructure that powers their success. Equinix enables today’s businesses to access all the right places, partners and possibilities they need to accelerate advantage. With Equinix, they can scale with agility, speed the launch of digital services, deliver world-class experiences and multiply their value.

NAICS: 51913
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 13,914
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fast-company.jpeg
Fast Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equinix.jpeg
Equinix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fast Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Equinix
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fast Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Internet Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Equinix in 2025.

Incident History — Fast Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fast Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Equinix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Equinix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fast-company.jpeg
Fast Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking of content management system
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equinix.jpeg
Equinix
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Equinix company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fast Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fast Company and Equinix have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Equinix company and Fast Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Equinix company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Fast Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Fast Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Equinix company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Equinix company nor Fast Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fast Company company nor Equinix company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Equinix company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fast Company company.

Equinix company employs more people globally than Fast Company company, reflecting its scale as a Internet Publishing.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fast Company nor Equinix holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N