Comparison Overview

Fashion Furniture Rental

VS

Ace Rent To Own

Fashion Furniture Rental

9225 Brown Deer Rd, San Diego, California, 92121, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

As California's premier furniture rental provider, Fashion Furniture Rental offers high-quality furnishings with straightforward pricing, all backed by our low price guarantee. From start to finish, Fashion makes any transition stress-free and effortless for you, providing everything you may need to feel at home away from home. Our quality of product and service is the reason why some of California's residents, communities, and home stagers use Fashion exclusively.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ace Rent To Own

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We pride ourselves on fast and friendly service, an outstanding selection, and making each customer’s interaction enjoyable and easy. This strong commitment to customer service has helped us become one of the best locally owned and operated rent to own companies serving Nebraska and Iowa. Our first store opened in 1982 and our family has been serving your family ever since. We now operate 19 locations, and have expanded our products and services to fit growing and changing customer trends over the years. We take great pride in being a privately owned rent to own company. This allows our company to show a unique brand of individuality when compared to our national competitors. Our products and services are second to none. Some companies talk about customer service, at Ace, we put our words into action. We look forward to earning your business and helping you to fill your home with the highest quality, top name brand furniture, electronics, and appliances.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fashion-furniture-rental.jpeg
Fashion Furniture Rental
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ace-rent-to-own.jpeg
Ace Rent To Own
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fashion Furniture Rental
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ace Rent To Own
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fashion Furniture Rental in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ace Rent To Own in 2025.

Incident History — Fashion Furniture Rental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fashion Furniture Rental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ace Rent To Own (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ace Rent To Own cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fashion-furniture-rental.jpeg
Fashion Furniture Rental
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ace-rent-to-own.jpeg
Ace Rent To Own
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ace Rent To Own company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fashion Furniture Rental company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ace Rent To Own company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fashion Furniture Rental company.

In the current year, Ace Rent To Own company and Fashion Furniture Rental company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ace Rent To Own company nor Fashion Furniture Rental company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ace Rent To Own company nor Fashion Furniture Rental company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ace Rent To Own company nor Fashion Furniture Rental company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental company nor Ace Rent To Own company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental company nor Ace Rent To Own company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fashion Furniture Rental company employs more people globally than Ace Rent To Own company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fashion Furniture Rental nor Ace Rent To Own holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.