Comparison Overview

Fashion and Textile Museum

VS

Maine Maritime Museum

Fashion and Textile Museum

83 Bermondsey Street, London, SE1 3XF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fashiontextilemuseum.org

The Fashion and Textile Museum is the only museum in the UK dedicated to showcasing contemporary fashion and textile design. The Museum is committed to presenting varied, creative and engaging exhibitions, alongside an exciting selection of educational courses, talks, events and workshops. In place of a permanent collection is a diverse programme of temporary exhibitions, displaying a broad range of innovative fashion and textiles from designers and makers around the world. The Fashion and Textile Museum was founded in 2003 by an icon of British design, Dame Zandra Rhodes. Today, the Museum is operated by Newham College – one of Europe’s largest further education colleges. Situated in the heart of fashionable Bermondsey Village, the Museum is housed in a beautiful and distinctive building, designed by renowned Mexican architect, Ricardo Legorreta.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Maine Maritime Museum

243 Washington St, Bath, Maine 04530-1638, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mainemaritimemuseum.org

Maine Maritime Museum connects the community and a worldwide audience to the past, present and future of Maine's waterways and Maine's important role in regional and global maritime activities. The Museum accomplishes its stewardship through: discriminate collection, preservation and dissemination of historic materials and information, engaging educational programs, relevant and compelling exhibitions, and a unique historic shipyard, all connecting the past to contemporary and future issues.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fashion-and-textile-museum.jpeg
Fashion and Textile Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-maritime-museum.jpeg
Maine Maritime Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fashion and Textile Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maine Maritime Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fashion and Textile Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maine Maritime Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Fashion and Textile Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fashion and Textile Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maine Maritime Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maine Maritime Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fashion-and-textile-museum.jpeg
Fashion and Textile Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-maritime-museum.jpeg
Maine Maritime Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maine Maritime Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fashion and Textile Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maine Maritime Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fashion and Textile Museum company.

In the current year, Maine Maritime Museum company and Fashion and Textile Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maine Maritime Museum company nor Fashion and Textile Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maine Maritime Museum company nor Fashion and Textile Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maine Maritime Museum company nor Fashion and Textile Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum company nor Maine Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum company nor Maine Maritime Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maine Maritime Museum company employs more people globally than Fashion and Textile Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fashion and Textile Museum nor Maine Maritime Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References